Cited by 396Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Management and Crop YieldSoil erosion and sediment transport

Crop Management for Soil Carbon Sequestration

Jarecki, Marek K., Lal, Rattan·2003·Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences

Abstract

Reducing emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) from agriculture is related to increasing and protecting soil organic matter (SOM) concentration. Agricultural soils can be a significant sink for atmospheric carbon (C) through increase of the SOM concentration. The natural ecosystems such as forests or prairies, where C gains are in equilibrium with losses, lose a large fraction of the antecedent C pool upon conversion to agricultural ecosystems. Adoption of recommended management practices (RMPs) can enhance the soil organic carbon (SOC) pool to fill the large C sink capacity on the world's agricultural soils. This article collates, reviews, and synthesizes the available information on SOC sequestration by RMPs, with specific references to crop rotations and tillage practices, cover crops, ley farming and agroforestry, use of manure and biosolids, N fertilization, and precision farming and irrigation. There is a strong interaction among RMPs with regards to their effect on SOC concentration and soil quality. The new equilibrium SOC level may be achieved over 25 to 50 years. While RMPs are being adapted in developed economies, there is an urgent need to encourage their adoption in developing countries. In addition to enhancing SOC concentration, adoption of RMPs also increases agronomic yield. Thus, key to enhancing soil quality and achieving food security lies in managing agricultural ecosystems using ecological principles which lead to enhancement of SOC pool and sustainable management of soil and water resources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/713608318

Cites

176 of 176 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Soil organic carbon sequestration is affected by crop management decisions, which impact the quantity and quality of crop residue added to the soil and the rate of decomposition.

    “Soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration is affected by crop management decisions, which impact the quantity and quality of crop residue added to the soil and rate of decomposition (Paustian et al. 2000, Jarecki and Lal 2003).”

    From LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF NET GREENHOUSE-GAS FLUX FOR BIOENERGY CROPPING SYSTEMS (2007) · cites this paper as Jarecki and Lal 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jarecki, M. K., & Lal, R.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Venue
Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
Published
2003-10
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
471-502
ISSN
  • 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7836
OpenAlex
W2102249809
Cited by
396
References
176
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 17
FWCI
7.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
soil carbon sequestration, soil organic matter, crop rotation, tillage systems, cover crops, ley farming, agroforestry, nitrogen fertilization, precision agriculture, irrigation, soil quality, greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture, food security, sustainable agriculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review