Cited by 203Cancer-related gene regulationEpigenetics and DNA MethylationEnzyme Structure and Function

Structural Basis of Substrate Methylation and Inhibition of SMYD2

Open access
Ferguson, Andrew D., Larsen, Nicholas A., Howard, Tina, Pollard, Hannah, Green, Isabelle, Grande, Christie, Cheung, Tony, Garcia-Arenas, Renee +5 more·2011·Structure

Abstract

Protein lysine methyltransferases are important regulators of epigenetic signaling. These enzymes catalyze the transfer of donor methyl groups from S-adenosylmethionine to specific acceptor lysines on histones, leading to changes in chromatin structure and transcriptional regulation. These enzymes also methylate nonhistone protein substrates, revealing an additional mechanism to regulate cellular physiology. The oncogenic protein SMYD2 represses the functional activities of the tumor suppressor proteins p53 and Rb, making it an attractive drug target. Here we report the discovery of AZ505, a potent and selective inhibitor of SMYD2 that was identified from a high throughput chemical screen. We also present the crystal structures of SMYD2 with p53 substrate and product peptides, and notably, in complex with AZ505. This substrate competitive inhibitor is bound in the peptide binding groove of SMYD2. These results have implications for the development of SMYD2 inhibitors, and indicate the potential for developing novel therapies targeting this target class.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.str.2011.06.011

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AZ505 is a selective SMYD2 inhibitor with an IC50 of 0.12 μM and greater than 600-fold selectivity.

    “We used AZ505, a selective SMYD2 inhibitor with an IC50 of 0.12 μM41 (>600 fold selectivity).”

    From Positive selection of somatically mutated clones identifies adaptive pathways in metabolic liver disease (2023) · cites this paper as [41]

    The HTS Assay and Hit Validation section reports AZ505’s IC50 as 0.12 (rendered as “mM” in our copy), and the Cofactor Binding Site section reports no potency against SMYD3. The paper describes a selectivity profile, but the passages do not establish the claimed greater-than-600-fold figure. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Because AZ505 binds to the active center of SMYD2, these experiments showed that SMYD2 enzymatic activity, and not just protein levels, contributes to fatty liver phenotypes.

    “Because AZ505 binds to the active center of SMYD241, these experiments also showed that SMYD2 enzymatic activity, and not just protein levels, contributes to fatty liver phenotypes.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Baker, N.A., Sept, D., Joseph, S., Holst, M.J., and McCammon, J.A. (2001). Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10037-10041.
  2. Bricogne, G., Blanc, E., Brandl, M., Flensburg, C., Keller, P., Paciorek, W., Roversi, P., Smart, O.S., Vonrhein, C., and Womack, T.O. (2009). BUSTER version 2.8.0 (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Global Phasing Ltd.).
  3. Ladbury, J.E. (2010). Calorimetry as a tool for understanding biomolecular interactions and an aid to drug design. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 38, 888-893.
  4. Zhang, X., and Bruice, T.C. (2008). Enzymatic mechanism and product specificity of SET-domain protein lysine methyltransferases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 5728-5732.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferguson, A. D., Larsen, N. A., Howard, T., Pollard, H., Green, I., Grande, C., Cheung, T., Garcia-Arenas, R., Cowen, S., Wu, J., Godin, R., Chen, H., & Keen, N.
Affiliations
  • AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Ferguson, Andrew D.
Venue
Structure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
19
Issue
9
Pages
1262-1273
ISSN
0969-2126 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071407989
Cited by
203
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 15
FWCI
8.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Structure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer-related gene regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
SMYD2, lysine methyltransferase, p53, Rb, crystal structure, peptide binding groove, oncoprotein, therapeutic target, epigenetic regulation
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Binding Sites, Coenzymes, Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor, Esophageal Neoplasms, Humans, Hydrogen Bonding, Methylation, Models, Molecular, Peptide Fragments, Protein Binding, Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase, Surface Properties, beta-Alanine, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Crystallography, X-Ray, Catalytic Domain, Amino Acid Motifs, Benzoxazines, Enzyme Assays, High-Throughput Screening Assays, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review