Cited by 30Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionElectron Spin Resonance Studies

Modeling of protein conformational changes with Rosetta guided by limited experimental data

Open access
Sala, Davide, del Alamo, Diego, Mchaourab, Hassane S., Meiler, Jens·2022·Structure

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Conformational changes are an essential component of functional cycles of many proteins, but their characterization often requires an integrative structural biology approach. Here, we introduce and benchmark ConfChangeMover (CCM), a new method built into the widely used macromolecular modeling suite Rosetta that is tailored to model conformational changes in proteins using sparse experimental data. CCM can rotate and translate secondary structural elements and modify their backbone dihedral angles in regions of interest. We benchmarked CCM on soluble and membrane proteins with simulated Cα-Cα distance restraints and sparse experimental double electron-electron resonance (DEER) restraints, respectively. In both benchmarks, CCM outperformed state-of-the-art Rosetta methods, showing that it can model a diverse array of conformational changes. In addition, the Rosetta framework allows a wide variety of experimental data to be integrated with CCM, thus extending its capability beyond DEER restraints. This method will contribute to the biophysical characterization of protein dynamics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.str.2022.04.013

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Sala, D., del Alamo, D., Mchaourab, H. S., & Meiler, J.
Affiliations
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Meiler, Jens
Venue
Structure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
1157-1168.e3
ISSN
0969-2126 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4282935478
Cited by
30
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Structure (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 DA046138, R01 GM080403, R01 GM128087, R01 GM129261, R01 HL122010)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (421152132)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electron Spin Resonance Studies
Keywords
protein conformational change, Rosetta, sparse experimental data, backbone dihedral angles, membrane proteins, protein dynamics, integrative structural biology
MeSH terms
Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy, Membrane Proteins, Protein Conformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review