Cited by 8Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

SeaMoon: From protein language models to continuous structural heterogeneity

Open access
Lombard, Valentin, Timsit, Dan, Grudinin, Sergei, Laine, Elodie·2025·Structure

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

How proteins move and deform determines their interactions with the environment and is thus of the utmost importance for cellular functioning. Following the revolution in single protein 3D structure prediction, researchers have focused on repurposing or developing deep learning models for sampling alternative protein conformations. In this work, we explored whether continuous compact representations of protein motions could be predicted directly from sequences, without exploiting 3D structures. SeaMoon leverages protein language model (pLM) embeddings as input to a lightweight convolutional neural network. We assessed SeaMoon against ∼1,000 collections of experimental conformations exhibiting diverse motions. It predicts at least one ground-truth motion with reasonable accuracy for 40% of the test proteins. SeaMoon captures motions inaccessible to normal mode analysis, an unsupervised physics-based method relying solely on 3D geometry, and generalizes to proteins without detectable sequence similarity to the training set. SeaMoon is easily retrainable with novel or updated pLMs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.str.2025.06.010

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Lombard, V., Timsit, D., Grudinin, S., & Laine, E.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR)
Corresponding author
Grudinin, Sergei
Venue
Structure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-09
Volume
33
Issue
9
Pages
1577-1590.e8
ISSN
0969-2126 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412520452
Cited by
8
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 1
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Structure (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • French National Research Agency
  • European Research Council (101087830)
  • European Commission
  • Sorbonne Université
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
protein conformational heterogeneity, protein language models, protein embeddings, convolutional neural networks, sequence-based prediction, normal mode analysis, protein dynamics
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review