Cited by 83Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMachine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and Dynamics

Graphical Models of Residue Coupling in Protein Families

Thomas, J., Ramakrishnan, N., Bailey-Kellogg, C.·2008·IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics

Abstract

Many statistical measures and algorithmic techniques have been proposed for studying residue coupling in protein families. Generally speaking, two residue positions are considered coupled if, in the sequence record, some of their amino acid type combinations are significantly more common than others. While the proposed approaches have proven useful in finding and describing coupling, a significant missing component is a formal probabilistic model that explicates and compactly represents the coupling, integrates information about sequence,structure, and function, and supports inferential procedures for analysis, diagnosis, and prediction.We present an approach to learning and using probabilistic graphical models of residue coupling. These models capture significant conservation and coupling constraints observable ina multiply-aligned set of sequences. Our approach can place a structural prior on considered couplings, so that all identified relationships have direct mechanistic explanations. It can also incorporate information about functional classes, and thereby learn a differential graphical model that distinguishes constraints common to all classes from those unique to individual classes. Such differential models separately account for class-specific conservation and family-wide coupling, two different sources of sequence covariation. They are then able to perform interpretable functional classification of new sequences, explaining classification decisions in terms of the underlying conservation and coupling constraints. We apply our approach in studies of both G protein-coupled receptors and PDZ domains, identifying and analyzing family-wide and class-specific constraints, and performing functional classification. The results demonstrate that graphical models of residue coupling provide a powerful tool for uncovering, representing, and utilizing significant sequence structure-function relationships in protein families.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcbb.2007.70225

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomas, J., Ramakrishnan, N., & Bailey-Kellogg, C.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • Virginia Tech Transportation Institute (US)
Venue
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
Published
2008-04
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
183-197
ISSN
1545-5963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106694138
Cited by
77
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein families, probabilistic graphical models, conservation restrictions, structural priors, functional classification, G protein-coupled receptors, PDZ domain, sequence-structure-function relationships, multiple sequence alignment
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Artificial Intelligence, Cattle, Computer Graphics, Computer Simulation, Humans, Models, Molecular, Proteins, Rhodopsin, Models, Statistical, Likelihood Functions, Sequence Alignment, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, PDZ Domains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review