Cited by 168Educational Assessment and ImprovementEvaluation and Performance AssessmentTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

Exploring data use practices around Europe: Identifying enablers and barriers

Open access
Schildkamp, Kim, Karbautzki, Louisa, Vanhoof, Jan·2014·Studies in Educational Evaluation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 168

Authors
Schildkamp, K., Karbautzki, L., & Vanhoof, J.
Affiliations
University of Twente (NL)
Corresponding author
Schildkamp, Kim
Venue
Studies in Educational Evaluation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
42
Pages
15-24
ISSN
0191-491X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985587743
Cited by
168
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
15.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Studies In Educational Evaluation (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • University of Twente
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
data-driven decision making, data use in schools, educational data, school development, accountability, teaching improvement, barriers to data use, professional development, cross-national comparison, European schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review