The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Challenges and Prospects of Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Utilization among Primary School Teachers: A Developing Country Perspective
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The concepts of virtualization for facilitating learning have become the focus of attention in several countries. Yet, the limited understanding of how technologies such as augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) can be used to improve the learning and teaching of science makes it difficult for educational policy makers to apply additional measures in order to ensure the availability of equipment and trained staff. A semi-structured interview was used to gather data from primary school teachers about the challenges and prospects of utilizing VR and AR technologies in teaching science subjects. A set of evidence and recommendations on AR and VR utilization for teaching science were provided based on an interview of 29 science teachers. It was determined that lack of competency, limited instructional design, lack of focused attention, lack of time, and limited environmental resources were common challenges in VR and AR utilization. In addition, we found that both technologies can be used to promote exploratory behavior and perceived usefulness and develop a positive attitude. Other findings related to these aspects were identified and described. The outcomes from this study can provide insights for administrators and policy makers to set priorities for using VR and AR in school practice to carry out various reflective and exploration tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Baragash, R. S., Al-Samarraie, H., Moody, L., & Zaqout, F. (2022) · Journal of Special Education Technology · doi:10.1177/0162643420910413 · Cited by 49
Self-citation
Cited by
AlGerafi, M. A. M., Zhou, Y., Oubibi, M., & Wijaya, T. T. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12183953 · Cited by 373
Virtual and augmented reality for biomedical applications
Venkatesan, M., Mohan, H., Ryan, J. R., Schürch, C. M., Nolan, G. P., Frakes, D. H., & Coskun, A. F. (2021) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100348 · Cited by 331
Mathematics education: What was it, what is it, and what will it be?
Cotič, M., Doz, D., Jenko, M., & Žakelj, A. (2024) · International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education · doi:10.29333/iejme/14663 · Cited by 19
Kim, J. W., Wang, K., Dorneich, M. C., Winer, E., Brown, L. J., & Whitehurst, G. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2026.3667033
Metadata
- Authors
- Alalwan, N., Cheng, L., Al-Samarraie, H., Yousef, R., Ibrahim Alzahrani, A., & Sarsam, S. M.
- Venue
- Studies in Educational Evaluation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 66
- Pages
- 100876
- ISSN
- 0191-491X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3018391770
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Challenges and Prospects of Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Utilization among Primary School Teachers: A Developing Country Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100876
- The paper
- Alalwan, N., Cheng, L., Al-Samarraie, H., Yousef, R., Ibrahim Alzahrani, A., & Sarsam, S. M. (2020). Challenges and Prospects of Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Utilization among Primary School Teachers: A Developing Country Perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100876
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.