The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unlocking the Potential: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Education
Open accessAbstract
Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) are poised to revolutionize education by offering immersive and interactive learning experiences. This research comprehensively evaluates the educational applications of AR and VR, specifically emphasizing their impact on student motivation, learning outcomes, engagement, and overall learning experiences. The analysis explores how AR and VR can improve student learning, knowledge retention, and skill acquisition by systematically reviewing existing the literature from diverse educational domains, including K-12 education, higher education, STEM education, professional training, and lifelong learning. Additionally, the research investigates the pivotal role of AR and VR in fostering immersive and interactive learning environments, unveiling how these technologies promote active learning, collaboration, and critical thinking through simulations and interactive experiences. The evaluation considers the potential of AR and VR beyond traditional classroom settings in distance education and assesses the feasibility of virtual classrooms, web-based learning environments, and Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). A significant aspect of the study involves understanding student attitudes toward AR and VR technologies and their influence on intrinsic motivation, interest, and enthusiasm for the learning material. Based on a thorough analysis of relevant literature, the research aims to provide practical recommendations for educators to effectively incorporate AR and VR into education practices. The recommendations prioritize a pedagogically sound design, educator training, and accessibility consideration to ensure equitable access for all learners. In summary, this extensive research reveals the significant impact of AR and VR on education by understanding the strengths, limitations, and challenges of making informed decisions on utilizing these technologies to create engaging, impactful learning experiences, fostering a generation of technologically proficient and knowledge-driven learners.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778 · Cited by 3,585
SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles
Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S., & Mertens, S. (2019) · Research Integrity and Peer Review · doi:10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8 · Cited by 3,469
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M., Dennehy, D., Metri, B., Buhalis, D., Cheung, C. M. K., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542 · Cited by 2,753
Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020) · Applied Developmental Science · doi:10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791 · Cited by 2,733
Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002 · Cited by 2,463
Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade
Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006) · Journal of Chiropractic Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0899-3467(07)60142-6 · Cited by 2,224
Writing narrative style literature reviews
Ferrari, R. (2015) · Medical Writing · doi:10.1179/2047480615z.000000000329 · Cited by 1,907
A Metaverse: Taxonomy, Components, Applications, and Open Challenges
Park, S.-M., & Kim, Y.-G. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3140175 · Cited by 1,824
Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1 · Cited by 1,458
Hamilton, D., McKechnie, J., Edgerton, E., & Wilson, C. (2021) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-020-00169-2 · Cited by 1,081
Cited by
Tobias, R. G., Lozano, J. A. G., Torres, M. L. M., Ramírez, J. A., Baldini, G. M., & Okoye, K. (2025) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-025-00575-x · Cited by 12
AI in assessment analysis and improvement
Trajkovski, G., & Hayes, H. (2025) · Digital Education and Learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-88252-4_4 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- AlGerafi, M. A. M., Zhou, Y., Oubibi, M., & Wijaya, T. T.
- Venue
- Electronics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-09-20
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 3953
- ISSN
- 2079-9292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4386895632
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 88
- FWCI
- 33.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unlocking the Potential: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/electronics12183953
- The paper
- AlGerafi, M. A. M., Zhou, Y., Oubibi, M., & Wijaya, T. T. (2023). Unlocking the Potential: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Education. Electronics. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12183953
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.