Cited by 2,319Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisOrgan Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesLiver Disease and Transplantation

Posthepatectomy liver failure: A definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS)

Rahbari, Nuh N., Garden, O. James, Padbury, Robert, Brooke-Smith, Mark, Crawford, Michael, Adam, Rene, Koch, Moritz, Makuuchi, Masatoshi +17 more·2011·Surgery

Abstract

Background Posthepatectomy liver failure is a feared complication after hepatic resection and a major cause of perioperative mortality. There is currently no standardized definition of posthepatectomy liver failure that allows valid comparison of results from different studies and institutions. The aim of the current article was to propose a definition and grading of severity of posthepatectomy liver failure. Methods A literature search on posthepatectomy liver failure after hepatic resection was conducted. Based on the normal course of biochemical liver function tests after hepatic resection, a simple and easily applicable definition of posthepatectomy liver failure was developed by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Furthermore, a grading of severity is proposed based on the impact on patients' clinical management. Results No uniform definition of posthepatectomy liver failure has been established in the literature addressing hepatic surgery. Considering the normal postoperative course of serum bilirubin concentration and International Normalized Ratio, we propose defining posthepatectomy liver failure as the impaired ability of the liver to maintain its synthetic, excretory, and detoxifying functions, which are characterized by an increased international normalized ratio and concomitant hyperbilirubinemia (according to the normal limits of the local laboratory) on or after postoperative day 5. The severity of posthepatectomy liver failure should be graded base…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.surg.2010.10.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rahbari, N. N., Garden, O. J., Padbury, R., Brooke-Smith, M., Crawford, M., Adam, R., Koch, M., Makuuchi, M., Dematteo, R. P., Christophi, C., Banting, S., Usatoff, V., Nagino, M., Maddern, G., Hugh, T. J., Vauthey, J.-N., Greig, P., Rees, M., Yokoyama, Y., Fan, S. T., Nimura, Y., Figueras, J., Capussotti, L., Büchler, M. W., & Weitz, J.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Flinders Medical Centre (AU)
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU)
  • The Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • Nagoya University (JP)
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital (AU)
  • Royal North Shore Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital (GB)
  • Queen Mary Hospital (CN)
  • Universitat de Girona (ES)
  • Candiolo Cancer Institute (IT)
Corresponding author
Büchler, Markus W.
Venue
Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
149
Issue
5
Pages
713-724
ISSN
0039-6060 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137869551
Cited by
2,319
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 176 · 2025: 186 · 2024: 247 · 2023: 215 · 2022: 225 · 2021: 224 · 2020: 190 · 2019: 152 · 2018: 142 · 2017: 140 · 2016: 133 · 2015: 113 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 66 · 2012: 24
FWCI
34.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
Keywords
post-hepatectomy liver failure, hepatectomy, severity classification, international normalized ratio, hyperbilirubinemia, serum bilirubin, liver synthetic function, perioperative mortality
MeSH terms
Bilirubin, Hepatectomy, Humans, International Cooperation, Liver, Liver Function Tests, Postoperative Complications, Severity of Illness Index, Liver Failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review