Cited by 84Patient Satisfaction in HealthcareHealthcare Quality and ManagementPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Understanding the determinants of patient satisfaction with surgical care using the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surgical care survey (S-CAHPS)

Open access
Schmocker, Ryan K., Cherney Stafford, Linda M., Siy, Alexander B., Leverson, Glen E., Winslow, Emily R.·2015·Surgery

Abstract

Background Patient satisfaction has been emphasized increasingly in all aspects of medicine, including the imposition of financial penalties for underperformance. Current measures of patient satisfaction, however, do not address aspects specific to the care of operative patients. Therefore, our aim was to examine the recently validated Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (S-CAHPS) to determine which aspects of perioperative care are predictive of satisfaction with the surgeon.Methods All patients undergoing a general surgery operation at our institution during a 5-month period were sent a modified S-CAHPS within 3 days of discharge. Patients were then divided into 2 groups: those who rated their surgeon as the best possible and those giving a lower rating. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine predictors of satisfaction with operative care. S-CAHPS results were then compared with other satisfaction measures in a subset of patients.Results The response rate was 45.3% (456/1,007). The average age was 59 ± 16 years, duration of stay was 4.1 ± 6.6 days, and 23% underwent unscheduled operations. A total of 72% of patients rated their surgeon as the best surgeon possible. On multivariate analysis, preoperative communication and attentiveness on the day of operation were the most important determinants of overall surgeon rating. S-CAHPS scores correlated with other standard measures of satisfaction (HCAHPS scores).Conclusion S-CAHPS is a novel operative satisfaction tool and is feasible to administer to patients undergoing general operative procedures. Surgeon characteristics most predictive of high patient satisfaction are effective preoperative communication and attentiveness on the day of operation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.surg.2015.06.018

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patient satisfaction was measured with the S-CAHPS questionnaire, a validated instrument developed by the American College of Surgeons and endorsed by the National Quality Forum.

    “The primary outcome was patient satisfaction based on the Surgical-Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (S-CAHPS) questionnaire overseen by the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmocker, R. K., Cherney Stafford, L. M., Siy, A. B., Leverson, G. E., & Winslow, E. R.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Winslow, Emily R.
Venue
Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
158
Issue
6
Pages
1724-1733
ISSN
0039-6060 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108768158
Cited by
84
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
17.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (T32-5T32CA090217-12)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
patient satisfaction, surgical care, perioperative care, surgeon satisfaction, preoperative communication, general surgery, predictors of satisfaction, HCAHPS
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Communication, Consumer Behavior, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, General Surgery, Multivariate Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Process Assessment, Health Care, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review