Cited by 161Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentMRI in cancer diagnosis

Fractional anisotropy value by diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of cell density and proliferation activity of glioblastomas

Beppu, Takaaki, Inoue, Takashi, Shibata, Yuji, Yamada, Noriyuki, Kurose, Akira, Ogasawara, Kuniaki, Ogawa, Akira, Kabasawa, Hiroyuki·2005·Surgical Neurology

Abstract

Background In vivo, water diffusion displays directionality due to presence of complex microstructural barriers in tissue. The extent of directionality of water diffusion can be expressed as a fractional anisotropy (FA) value using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DTI). The FA value has been suggested as an indicator of the cell density of astrocytic tumors. The aim of the present study was to confirm beyond doubt that FA values indicate cell density even when limited in glioblastomas and to determine whether the FA value of a given patient predicts proliferation activity in the individual glioblastoma.Methods We performed DTI in 19 patients with glioblastoma and measured the FA values of tumor and normal brain regions prior to computed tomography-guided stereotactic biopsy. Differences in mean FA value between normal brain regions and glioblastoma lesion were compared. Cell density and MIB-1 indices were examined using tumor specimens obtained from biopsies. Correlation among FA values, cell density, and MIB-1 indices was also evaluated.Results The mean FA value significantly differed between normal brain regions and glioblastoma lesions. Positive correlation was observed between FA value and cell density (r = 0.73, P < 0.05) and between FA value and MIB-1 index (r = 0.80, P < 0.05).Conclusions Our results suggest that the FA value of glioblastoma as determined by DTI prior to surgery is a good predictor of cell density and, consequently, proliferation activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.02.034

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior studies indicate that FA can predict cell number and tissue density, and that higher FA may reflect greater tissue integrity.

    “Some studies showed that FA can predict cell number and tissue density (60,61) and that higher FA could indicate greater tissue integrity.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beppu, T., Inoue, T., Shibata, Y., Yamada, N., Kurose, A., Ogasawara, K., Ogawa, A., & Kabasawa, H.
Affiliations
  • Iwate Medical University (JP)
  • GE HealthCare (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Beppu, Takaaki
Venue
Surgical Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
56-61
ISSN
0090-3019 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036444310
Cited by
161
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Surgical Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
Keywords
glioblastoma, fractional anisotropy, diffusion tensor imaging, cell density, tumor cell proliferation, MIB-1 labeling index, stereotactic biopsy, preoperative prediction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Body Water, Brain, Brain Neoplasms, Diffusion, Female, Glioblastoma, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Anisotropy, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cell Proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review