Cited by 152Environmental Impact and SustainabilityPhotovoltaic Systems and SustainabilityExtraction and Separation Processes

Research gaps in environmental life cycle assessments of lithium ion batteries for grid-scale stationary energy storage systems: End-of-life options and other issues

Open access
Pellow, Matthew A., Ambrose, Hanjiro, Mulvaney, Dustin, Betita, Rick, Shaw, Stephanie·2020·Sustainable Materials and Technologies

Abstract

Although deployments of grid-scale stationary lithium ion battery energy storage systems are accelerating, the environmental impacts of this new infrastructure class are not well studied. To date, a small literature of environmental life cycle assessments (LCAs) and related studies has examined associated environmental impacts, but they rely on a variety of methods and system boundaries rather than a consistent approach. The large LCA literature of transportation applications of LIB contains selected life-cycle inventory data relevant for stationary ESSs, but does not incorporate characteristics unique to stationary systems, such as balance of system materials; operational profiles; and perhaps even different end-of-life (EOL) phase needs. This critical literature review surveys the existing studies on grid-scale stationary LIB ESS, and highlights research gaps concerning comprehensive environmental impacts. Further analysis specific to grid-connected LIB systems – encompassing use phase (battery operation) and EOL, in addition to production phase – is required for a robust assessment of environmental impacts of grid-connected energy storage in LIB systems. For example, thus far studies that systematically evaluate the consequential impact of storage system operation have been focused on energy arbitrage and frequency regulation applications. Future work should consider the impact of ESS providing other grid services as well. Although EOL costs and impacts for stationary LIB ESSs are an important consideration for prospective asset owners and key users of grid-scale ESS (such as electric utility companies and project developers), they are not yet addressed in the literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.susmat.2019.e00120

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Production of e-Fuels necessitates monumental build-out of new infrastructure for renewable electricity generation, potentially large-scale CO2 capture facilities and pipeline networks, and advanced electrolyzer plants.

    “Beyond the fuel itself, the production of e-Fuels necessitates a monumental build-out of new infrastructure for renewable electricity generation [25,382] (far exceeding current capacities), potentially large-scale CO 2 capture facilities and pipeline networks, and advanced electrolyzer plants [19,66].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pellow, M. A., Ambrose, H., Mulvaney, D., Betita, R., & Shaw, S.
Affiliations
  • Electric Power Research Institute (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • San Jose State University (US)
Corresponding author
Shaw, Stephanie
Venue
Sustainable Materials and Technologies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
23
Pages
e00120
ISSN
  • 2214-9929 (ISSN-L)
  • 2214-9937
OpenAlex
W2959669394
Cited by
152
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 1
FWCI
7.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainable materials and technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • San José State University ScholarWorks (San Jose State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Electric Power Research Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
Keywords
lithium-ion batteries, life cycle assessment, end-of-life options, battery recycling, grid services, energy arbitrage, frequency regulation, research gaps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review