Life cycle assessment of the energy consumption and GHG emissions of state-of-the-art automotive battery cell production
Open accessAbstract
As the production of automotive battery cells has expanded worldwide, concerns have arisen regarding the corresponding energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, data on the energy consumption and GHG emissions of battery cell production are scarce, uncertain in quality and accuracy, and mostly outdated. To improve the availability and accuracy of battery production data, one goal of this study was to determine the energy consumption of state-of-the-art battery cell production and calculate the related GHG emissions. Machine specifications for energy consumption were gathered from multiple manufacturers during the planning and construction of a research factory in Germany with a theoretical output of 7 GWh per year of electrode capacity. The energy consumption and associated GHG emissions were determined for each step in the production process and for the process overall. It was found that only a few steps were responsible for most of the required energy and GHG emissions, with coating and drying, formation, and drying rooms consuming a combined 76% of the total energy and emitting 74% of all GHGs. A second goal was to determine the impact of internal energy sourcing on GHG emissions. It turns out that switching from a mix of electricity and natural gas to electricity only could reduce GHG emissions if the electricity used at the plant had a low GHG emission factor. In Europe, the Swedish electricity grid has the lowest GHG emission factor; the overall emissions of battery cell production could be reduced from 4.54 to 0.53 kg CO 2 -eq/kWh battery cell capacity if production was only powered by electricity. However, nuclear energy accounts for a large share (30%) of the electricity mix in Sweden, and is questionable from an environmental perspective.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The production of battery materials and subsequent LIB cell manufacturing contribute considerably to greenhouse gas emissions.
“the production of battery materials4–7 and the subsequent LIB cell manufacturing8–10 contribute considerably to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions”
From Carbon footprint distributions of lithium-ion batteries and their materials (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
Cites
On the sustainability of lithium ion battery industry – A review and perspective
Yang, Y., Okonkwo, E. G., Huang, G., Xu, S., Sun, W., & He, Y. (2020) · Energy storage materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2020.12.019 · Cited by 896 · see citing works
The environmental impact of Li-Ion batteries and the role of key parameters – A review
Peters, J. F., Baumann, M., Zimmermann, B., Braun, J., & Weil, M. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.039 · Cited by 856 · see citing works
Contribution of Li-Ion Batteries to the Environmental Impact of Electric Vehicles
Notter, D. A., Gauch, M., Widmer, R., Wäger, P. A., Stamp, A., Zah, R., & Althaus, H. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es903729a · Cited by 842 · see citing works
Life cycle assessment of a lithium-ion battery vehicle pack
Ellingsen, L. A., Majeau‐Bettez, G., Singh, B., Srivastava, A. K., Valøen, L. O., & Strømman, A. H. (2014) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12072 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Majeau-Bettez, G., Hawkins, T. R., & Strømman, A. H. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es103607c · Cited by 662 · see citing works
Dunn, J. B., Gaines, L., Kelly, J. C., James, C., & Gallagher, K. G. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee03029j · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles–Critical issues
Zackrisson, M., Avellán, L., & Orlenius, J. (2010) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.004 · Cited by 551 · see citing works
Life cycle analysis of lithium-ion batteries for automotive applications
Dai, Q., Kelly, J. C., Gaines, L., & Wang, M. (2019) · Batteries · doi:10.3390/batteries5020048 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Dunn, J. B., Gaines, L. L., Sullivan, J. L., & Wang, M. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es302420z · Cited by 457 · see citing works
A qualitative assessment of lithium ion battery recycling processes
Sommerville, R. P. Z., Zhu, P., Rajaeifar, M. A., et al. (2020) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105219 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Toward a cell‐chemistry specific life cycle assessment of lithium‐ion battery recycling processes
Mohr, M., Peters, J. F., Baumann, M., & Weil, M. (2020) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.13021 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Cradle-to-Gate Emissions from a Commercial Electric Vehicle Li-Ion Battery: A Comparative Analysis
Kim, H. C., Wallington, T. J., Arsenault, R., Bae, C., Ahn, S., & Lee, J. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b00830 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Global implications of the EU battery regulation
Melin, H. E., Rajaeifar, M. A., Ku, A. Y., Kendall, A. M., Harper, G. D. J., & Heidrich, O. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abh1416 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Cusenza, M. A., Bobba, S., Ardente, F., Cellura, M., & Persio, F. D. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.056 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Sun, X., Luo, X., Zhang, Z., Meng, F., & Yang, J. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123006 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Life cycle assessment of lithium sulfur battery for electric vehicles
Deng, Y., Li, J., Li, T., Gao, X., & Yuan, C. Y. (2017) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.036 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Providing a common base for life cycle assessments of Li-Ion batteries
Peters, J. F., & Weil, M. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.016 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Li, B., Gao, X., Li, J., & Yuan, C. Y. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es4037786 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Marques, P., Garcia, R., Kulay, L., & Freire, F. M. C. S. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.026 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Primary and secondary use of electric mobility batteries from a life cycle perspective
Faria, R., Marques, P., Garcia, R., Moura, P., Freire, F. M. C. S., Delgado, J., & de Almeida, A. T. (2014) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.092 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Pellow, M. A., Ambrose, H., Mulvaney, D., Betita, R., & Shaw, S. (2020) · Sustainable Materials and Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.susmat.2019.e00120 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Comparative life cycle assessment of lithium-ion battery chemistries for residential storage
Varlet, T. L., Schmidt, O., Gambhir, A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2020.101230 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Kallitsis, E., Korre, A., Kelsall, G., Kupfersberger, M., & Nie, Z. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120067 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Life-cycle assessment of electricity in Portugal
Garcia, R., Marques, P., & Freire, F. M. C. S. (2014) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.067 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Globally regional life cycle analysis of automotive lithium-ion nickel manganese cobalt batteries
Kelly, J. C., Dai, Q., & Wang, M. (2020) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-019-09869-2 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Jiang, S., Zhang, L., Li, F., Hua, H., Liu, X., Yuan, Z., & Wu, H. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110253 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Ambrose, H., & Kendall, A. M. (2016) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2016.05.009 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Ioakimidis, C. S., Murillo-Marrodán, A., Bagheri, A., Thomas, D., & Genikomsakis, K. N. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11092527 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Zhao, S., & You, F. (2019) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05902 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
A Review of Life Cycle Assessment Studies of Electric Vehicles with a Focus on Resource Use
Dolganova, I., Rödl, A., Bach, V., Kaltschmitt, M., & Finkbeiner, M. (2020) · Resources · doi:10.3390/resources9030032 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Ma, Y., Ke, R.-Y., Han, R., et al. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.131 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Application of Life Cycle Assessment to Lithium Ion Batteries in the Automotive Sector
Tolomeo, R., Feo, G. D., Adami, R., & Osséo, L. S. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12114628 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Wu, Z., & Kong, D. (2018) · Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy · doi:10.1007/s10098-018-1548-9 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Life cycle impact assessment of electric vehicle battery charging in European Union countries
Burchart-Korol, D., Jursová, S., FOLĘGA, P., et al. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120476 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Jinasena, A., Burheim, O. S., & Strømman, A. H. (2021) · Batteries · doi:10.3390/batteries7010014 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Jenu, S., Deviatkin, I., Hentunen, A., Myllysilta, M., Viik, S., & Pihlatie, M. H. (2019) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2019.101023 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
A Prospective Net Energy and Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment of the UK Electricity Grid
Raugei, M., Kamran, M., & Hutchinson, A. R. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13092207 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Energy storage systems for PV-based communal grids
Opiyo, N. N. (2016) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2016.05.001 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Weeber, M., Wanner, J., Schlegel, P., et al. (2020) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.179 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Analysis of materials and energy flows of different lithium ion traction batteries
Simon, B., & Weil, M. (2013) · Revue de Métallurgie · doi:10.1051/metal/2013056 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Wang, S., & Yu, J. (2020) · Investigationes Linguisticae · doi:10.14746/il.2019.43.5 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Degen, F., Winter, M., Bendig, D., & Tübke, J. (2023) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-023-01355-z · Cited by 861 · see citing works
Self-citationCharging sustainable batteries
Bauer, C., Burkhardt, S., Dasgupta, N. P., Ellingsen, L. A.-W., Gaines, L. L., Hao, H., Hischier, R., Hu, L., Huang, Y., Janek, J., et al. (2022) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-022-00864-1 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Carbon footprint distributions of lithium-ion batteries and their materials
Peiseler, L., Schenker, V., Schatzmann, K., Pfister, S., Wood, V., & Schmidt, T. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-54634-y · Cited by 131 · see citing works
- Authors
- Degen, F., & Schütte, M.
- Affiliations
- Fraunhofer Institute for Production Technology IPT (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schütte, Marius
- ORCID
- Degen, Florian
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 330
- Pages
- 129798
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3216442049
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 15
- FWCI
- 7.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (03XP0256)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Keywords
- energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, life cycle assessment, battery manufacturing, electricity mix, natural gas, nuclear energy, battery formation, CO2 equivalent emissions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
