CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 108Concrete and Cement Materials ResearchMicrobial Applications in Construction MaterialsMaterials Engineering and Processing

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ambient-cured geopolymer concrete with single alkali activator

Zannerni, Ghina M., Fattah, Kazi P., Al-Tamimi, Adil K.·2020·Sustainable Materials and Technologies
DOI 10.1016/j.susmat.2019.e00131
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.susmat.2019.e00131

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Zhang, 2014, Geopolymer foam concrete: an emerging material for sustainable construction, Constr. Build. Mater., 56, 113, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.081 · DOI
  2. Aslani, 2015, Thermal performance modeling of geopolymer concrete, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 28, 4015062, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001291 · DOI
  3. Proske, 2013, Eco-friendly concretes with reduced water and cement contents—mix design principles and laboratory tests, Cem. Concr. Res., 51, 38, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.04.011 · DOI
  4. Elchalakani, 2014, Sustainable concrete with high volume GGBFS to build Masdar City in the UAE, Case Stud. Constr. Mater., 1, 10
  5. Ravikumar, 2010, Structure and strength of NaOH activated concretes containing fly ash or GGBFS as the sole binder, Cem. Concr. Compos., 32, 399, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.03.007 · DOI
  6. Motorwala, 2013, ALKALI activated FLY-ASH based geopolymer concrete, Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng., 3, 159
  7. Cho, 2017, Effect of Na2O content, SiO2/Na2O molar ratio, and curing conditions on the compressive strength of FA-based geopolymer, Constr. Build. Mater., 145, 253, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.004 · DOI
  8. Nath, 2014, Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition, Constr. Build. Mater., 66, 163, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.080 · DOI
  9. Okoye, 2016, Effect of silica fume on the mechanical properties of fly ash based-geopolymer concrete, Ceram. Int., 42, 3000, 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.10.084 · DOI
  10. Diaz-Loya, 2011, Mechanical properties of fly-ash-based geopolymer concrete, ACI Mater. J., 108, 300
  11. Rafeet, 2019, Effects of slag substitution on physical and mechanical properties of fly ash-based alkali activated binders (AABs), Cem. Concr. Res., 122, 118, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.003 · DOI
  12. Alanazi, 2019, Effect of slag, silica fume, and metakaolin on properties and performance of alkali-activated fly ash cured at ambient temperature, Constr. Build. Mater., 197, 747, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.172 · DOI
  13. Ma, 2018, Structural and material performance of geopolymer concrete: a review, Constr. Build. Mater., 186, 90, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.111 · DOI
  14. Oderji, 2019, Fresh and hardened properties of one-part fly ash-based geopolymer binders cured at room temperature: effect of slag and alkali activators, J. Clean. Prod., 225, 1, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.290 · DOI
  15. Bondar, 2018, Alkali activated slag concretes designed for a desired slump, strength and chloride diffusivity, Constr. Build. Mater., 190, 191, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.124 · DOI
  16. Chen, 2018, Compressive strength and microstructural properties of dry-mixed geopolymer pastes synthesized from GGBS and sewage sludge ash, Constr. Build. Mater., 182, 597, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.159 · DOI
  17. Bouaissi, 2019, Mechanical properties and microstructure analysis of FA-GGBS-HMNS based geopolymer concrete, Constr. Build. Mater., 210, 198, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.202 · DOI
  18. Elyamany, 2018, Setting time and 7-day strength of geopolymer mortar with various binders, Constr. Build. Mater., 187, 974, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.025 · DOI
  19. Perumal, 2011, A review on the utilization of bottom ash
  20. A. M Mahajan, B.A. and P. Patel, Eds. Technology Drivers: Engine for Growth: Proceedings of the 6th Nirma University International Conference on Engineering (NUiCONE 2017), November 23–25, 2017, Ahmedabad, India, 1st ed. Leiden, The Netherlands: CRC Press, 2018.
  21. Ghosh, 2019, Durability and mechanical behavior of fly ash-GGBFS geopolymer concrete utilizing bottom ash as fine aggregate, Trans. Indian Ceram. Soc., 78, 24, 10.1080/0371750X.2019.1581092 · DOI
  22. Xie, 2015, Behavior of low-calcium fly and bottom ash-based geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature, Ceram. Int., 41, 5945, 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.01.031 · DOI
  23. Elaty, 2014, Performance of Portland cement mixes containing silica fume and mixed with lime-water, HBRC J., 10, 247, 10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.12.004 · DOI
  24. Flower, 2007, Green house gas emissions due to concrete manufacture, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 12, 282, 10.1065/lca2007.05.327 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Turner, 2013, Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: a comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete, Constr. Build. Mater., 43, 125, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023 · DOI
  26. Topark-Ngarm, 2014, Setting time, strength, and bond of high-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 27, 4014198, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001157 · DOI
  27. Nagral, 2014, Effect of curing temperature and curing hours on the properties of geopolymer concrete, Int. J. Compu. Eng. Res., 4, 1
  28. Nguyen, 2016, Theoretical and experimental study on mechanical properties and flexural strength of fly ash-geopolymer concrete, Constr. Build. Mater., 106, 65, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.033 · DOI
  29. Wardhono, 2017, Comparison of long term performance between alkali activated slag and fly ash geopolymer concretes, Constr. Build. Mater., 143, 272, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.153 · DOI
  30. Adak, 2017, Structural performance of nano-silica modified fly-ash based geopolymer concrete, Constr. Build. Mater., 135, 430, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.111 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zannerni, G. M., Fattah, K. P., & Al-Tamimi, A. K.
Affiliations
American University of Sharjah (AE)
Corresponding author
Fattah, Kazi P.
ORCID
Venue
Sustainable Materials and Technologies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
23
Pages
e00131
ISSN
  • 2214-9929 (ISSN-L)
  • 2214-9937
DOI
10.1016/j.susmat.2019.e00131
OpenAlex
W2982040056
Cited by
108
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 6
FWCI
8.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Sustainable materials and technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Applications in Construction Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Materials Engineering and Processing
Keywords
geopolymer concrete, ambient curing, ground granulated blast furnace slag, fly ash, silica fume, cement replacement, compressive strength, tensile strength, microstructure, carbon emission reduction, sustainable concrete

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review