Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
McDonough (2004) found learners rarely modified their output in response to peer feedback, choosing instead to produce self-initiated modified output.
“In her investigation of L2 pair interaction among English as a foreign language (EFL) learners in Thailand, McDonough (2004) found that learners rarely modified their output in response to peer feedback, choosing instead to produce self-initiated modified output.”
From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as McDonough 2004
Increased peer interaction led to improved production of English conditionals, the target feature.
“Nevertheless, increased peer interaction led to improved production of English conditionals, the target feature (see also Buckwalter 2001;Toth 2008;Smith 2009).”
From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as McDonough 2004
Learners tend to self-correct more while interacting with other learners than when interacting with L1 speakers.
“Finally, while much less investigated, research indicates that learners tend to self-correct more while interacting with other learners than when interacting with L1 speakers.”
From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as McDonough 2004
Learners who participated more frequently in corrective feedback were the ones who showed significant improvement in oral tests that elicited use of conditionals.
“She reported that those learners who participated more frequently in the corrective feedback were the ones who showed significant improvement in oral tests that elicited use of conditionals.”
From Focus on form: A critical review (2016) · cites this paper as McDonough (2004)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 295
- Authors
- McDonough, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- McDonough, Kim
- ORCID
- McDonough, Kim
- Venue
- System
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 207-224
- ISSN
- 0346-251X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041847391
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 24.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- System (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- student-student interaction, pair work, small group work, EFL classroom, Thai EFL learners, student participation, instructor perceptions, learner perceptions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
