Cited by 43EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLinguistics and Language Analysis

Immediate learner repair and its relationship with learning targeted forms in dyadic interaction

Nassaji, Hossein·2011·System

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.system.2011.01.016

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The relationship between uptake/repair and learning depends on the type of repair, with a stronger relationship when the repair involved incorporation of the target form into a new utterance than when it involved repetition of the feedback.

    “Nassaji (2011) showed that the relationship between uptake/repair with learning depended on the type of repair with a stronger relationship between the two when the repair involved incorporation of the target form into new utterance than when it involved repetition of the feedback.”

    From Focus on form: A critical review (2016) · cites this paper as Nassaji (2011)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nassaji, H.
Affiliations
University of Victoria (CA)
Corresponding author
Nassaji, Hossein
Venue
System
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
17-29
ISSN
0346-251X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039047992
Cited by
43
References
6
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
23.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
System (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
Keywords
self-healing, recasts, elicitation, interactional feedback, second language acquisition, ESL learners, error correction, maintenance of learning, native speaker teachers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review