Immediate learner repair and its relationship with learning targeted forms in dyadic interaction
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The relationship between uptake/repair and learning depends on the type of repair, with a stronger relationship when the repair involved incorporation of the target form into a new utterance than when it involved repetition of the feedback.
“Nassaji (2011) showed that the relationship between uptake/repair with learning depended on the type of repair with a stronger relationship between the two when the repair involved incorporation of the target form into new utterance than when it involved repetition of the feedback.”
From Focus on form: A critical review (2016) · cites this paper as Nassaji (2011)
Cites
The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977) · Language · doi:10.2307/413107 · Cited by 5,150 · see citing works
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNER UPTAKE: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263197001034 · Cited by 2,259 · see citing works
INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT: An Empirical Study of Question Formation in ESL
Mackey, A. (1999) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263199004027 · Cited by 772 · see citing works
Error correction, revision, and learning
Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y.-P. (2008) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
INCIDENTAL FOCUS ON FORM AND SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING
Loewen, S. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263105050163 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Responses to Recasts: Repetitions, Primed Production, and Linguistic Development
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2006) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00393.x · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Focus on form: A critical review
Ellis, R. (2016) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168816628627 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nassaji, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Victoria (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Nassaji, Hossein
- ORCID
- Nassaji, Hossein
- Venue
- System
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-29
- ISSN
- 0346-251X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039047992
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 23.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- System (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Keywords
- self-healing, recasts, elicitation, interactional feedback, second language acquisition, ESL learners, error correction, maintenance of learning, native speaker teachers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review