Cited by 66EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningMemory Processes and Influences

Spaced vs. massed distribution instruction for L2 grammar learning

Miles, Scott W.·2014·System

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.system.2014.01.014

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an empirical study on L2 grammar learning, spaced practice seems more effective than massed practice at least for acquisition of receptive grammatical knowledge.

    “In an empirical study on L2 grammar learning (Miles, 2014), spaced practice also seems more effective than massed practice at least for the acquisition of receptive grammatical knowledge.”

    From MASSED TASK REPETITION IS A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD FOR FLUENCY DEVELOPMENT (2022) · cites this paper as Miles, 2014

  • Spacing effects seem applicable to L2 vocabulary and grammar learning.

    “Many researchers have demonstrated that spacing effects seem also applicable to L2 vocabulary and grammar learning.”

    From MASSED TASK REPETITION IS A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD FOR FLUENCY DEVELOPMENT (2022) · cites this paper as Miles, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miles, S. W.
Affiliations
Daegu Haany University (KR)
Corresponding author
Miles, Scott W.
Venue
System
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
42
Pages
412-428
ISSN
0346-251X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068498765
Cited by
66
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
25.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
System (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
spacing effect, second language grammar acquisition, grammar instruction, translation, forgetting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review