Maintenance of Foreign Language Vocabulary and the Spacing Effect
Abstract
In a 9-year longitudinal investigation, 4 subjects learned and relearned 300 English-foreign language word pairs. Either 13 or 26 relearning sessions were administered at intervals of 14, 28, or 56 days. Retention was tested for 1.2.3. or 5 years after training terminated. The longer intersession intervals slowed down acquisition slightly, but this disadvantage during training was offset by substantially higher retention. Thirteen retraining sessions spaced at 56 days yielded retention comparable to 26 sessions spaced at 14 days. The retention benefit due to additional sessions was independent of the benefit due to spacing, and both variables facilitated retention of words regardless of difficulty level and of the consistency of retrieval during training. The benefits of spaced retrieval practice to long-term maintenance of access to academic knowledge areas are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bahrick et al. (1993) reported that subjects needed twice as many trials in the second study session to reach criterion as gap increased from 14 to 56 days.
“Bahrick et al. (1993) reported that subjects required twice as many trials in the second study session in order to achieve criterion, as gap increased from 14 to 56 days.”
From Optimizing distributed practice (2009) · cites this paper as Bahrick et al. (1993)
Every study examined here with a retention interval longer than one month demonstrated a benefit from distribution of learning across weeks or months, as opposed to learning across a one-day interval.
“Every study examined here with a retention interval longer than one month (Bahrick, 1979; Bahrick, et al., 1993; Bahrick & Phelps, 1987; Cepeda et al., 2005) demonstrated a benefit from distribution of learning across weeks or months, as opposed to learning across a one-day interval;”
From Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. (2006) · cites this paper as Bahrick, et al., 1993
The Bahrick studies confounded number of relearning trials with ISI; there was more relearning at longer ISIs.
“These studies confounded number of relearning trials with ISI; that is, there was more relearning at longer ISIs.”
From Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. (2006) · cites this paper as Bahrick et al., 1993
The 56-day gap in Bahrick et al. (1993) was a relatively short proportion of the extremely long retention intervals used, and this ratio is probably most critical.
“However, 56 days is actually a relatively short proportion of the extremely long retention intervals used in Bahrick et al.'s study, and it is this ratio that is probably most critical, as will emerge below.”
From Spacing Effects in Learning: A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention (2008) · cites this paper as Bahrick et al., 1993
In Bahrick et al. (1993), increasing the inter-study spacing out to 56 days improved performance in acquisition and retention of foreign language vocabulary over several years.
“The results showed that increasing the inter-study spacing out to 56 days improved performance (Figure 2).”
From Spacing Effects in Learning: A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention (2008) · cites this paper as Bahrick et al., 1993
The fixed performance criterion used in Bahrick studies confounds total study time and spacing gap in favor of greater spacing gaps.
“Another issue in interpreting the Bahrick studies (Bahrick et al., 1993;Bahrick & Phelps, 1987) is the use of a fixed performance criterion.Given the forgetting that takes place during the gap between study sessions, this inevitably means that many more relearning trials will be necessary during most sessions at the longest gap (as compared to the shortest).”
From Spacing Effects in Learning: A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention (2008) · cites this paper as Bahrick et al., 1993
Cites
Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology
Ebbinghaus, H. (2013) · Annals of Neurosciences · doi:10.5214/ans.0972.7531.200408 · Cited by 2,827 · see citing works
Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00029.x · Cited by 1,582 · see citing works
Memory; a contribution to experimental psychology,
Ebbinghaus, H., Bussenius, C. E., & Ruger, H. A. (n.d.) · University of Michigan Library Repository · Cited by 1,281 · see citing works
Implications of short-term memory for a general theory of memory
Melton, A. W. (1963) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(63)80063-8 · Cited by 739 · see citing works
The situation with respect to the spacing of repetitions and memory
Melton, A. W. (1970) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(70)80107-4 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Semantic memory content in permastore: Fifty years of memory for Spanish learned in school.
Bahrick, H. P. (1984) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.1 · Cited by 505 · see citing works
Self-citationComponent-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition
Glenberg, A. M. (1979) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197590 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research.
Dempster, F. N. (1988) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.43.8.627 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Intraserial repetition and coding processes in free recall
Madigan, S. A. (1969) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(69)80050-2 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Retention of Spanish vocabulary over 8 years.
Bahrick, H. P., & Phelphs, E. (1987) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.2.344 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Self-citationDo different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory?
Leonesio, R. J., & Nelson, T. O. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.16.3.464 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
When forgetting helps memory: an analysis of repetition effects
Cuddy, L. J., & Jacoby, L. L. (1982) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(82)90727-7 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Interpreting Harry Bahrick's discovery: What confers immunity against forgetting?
Neisser, U. (1984) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.113.1.32 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Contextual Enrichment and Distribution of Practice in the Classroom
Smith, S. M., & Rothkopf, E. Z. (1984) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0103_4 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Effects of repetition and spaced review upon retention of a complex learning task.
Reynolds, J. H., & Glaser, R. A. (1964) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0040734 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Stabilized memory of unrehearsed knowledge.
Bahrick, H. P. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.121.1.112 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citationTemporal position of reviews and its effect on the retention of mathematical rules.
Gay, L. R. (1973) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0034595 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Conservation of information-processing capacity in paired-associate memorizing
Greeno, J. G. (1970) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(70)80105-0 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Bruce, D. R., & Bahrick, H. P. (1992) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.47.2.319 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationDistribution of practice and between-trials interference.
Bregman, A. S. (1967) · Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie · doi:10.1037/h0082962 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612453266 · Cited by 3,138 · see citing works
Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis.
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354 · Cited by 1,888 · see citing works
“The Bahrick studies (Bahrick, 1979; Bahrick et al., 1993; Bahrick & Phelps, 1987), which confounded amount of relearning and ISI, showed similar patterns to Cepeda et al. (2005), Experiments 2a and 2b, which are unconfounded.”
BackgroundResultEducational Data Mining and Learning Analytics
Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_4 · Cited by 1,333 · see citing works
Hulstijn, J. H. (2001) · Cognition and Second Language Instruction · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524780.011 · Cited by 769 · see citing works
“Quite remarkable in this respect are the investigations of Bahrick and his associates and relatives (Bahrick, 1984; Bahrick & Phelps, 1987; H.P. Bahrick, L.E. Bahrick, A.S. Bahrick & P.E. Bahrick, 1993).”
BackgroundLearning Versus Performance: An Integrative Review
Soderstrom, N. C., & Bjork, R. A. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615569000 · Cited by 651 · see citing works
“Similarly, spacing study sessions, relative to massing them, can actually slow down the acquisition of foreign language vocabulary pairs but can still lead to superior retention—even over a span of several years (Bahrick, Bahrick, Bahrick, & Bahrick, 1993).”
BackgroundSpacing Effects in Learning: A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention
Cepeda, N. J., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., & Pashler, H. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02209.x · Cited by 631 · see citing works
Learning Concepts and Categories: Is Spacing the “Enemy of Induction”?
Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02127.x · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Carpenter, S. K., Cepeda, N. J., Rohrer, D., Kang, S. H. K., & Pashler, H. (2012) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9205-z · Cited by 469 · see citing works
Applying the Science of Learning
Mayer, R. E. (2010) · Cited by 400 · see citing works
The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body
Kording, K. P., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Shadmehr, R. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1901 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
A Comparison of the Effects of Reading and Listening on Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition
Vidal, K. (2010) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00593.x · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Optimising learning using flashcards: Spacing is more effective than cramming
Kornell, N. (2009) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1537 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
The shuffling of mathematics problems improves learning
Rohrer, D., & Taylor, K. (2007) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9015-8 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
“For this reason, many previous authors have advocated that learners space their study (Bahrick et al., 1993; Bjork, 1979, 1988, 1994; Bloom & Shuell, 1981; Cepeda, Pashler, Vul, Wixted, & Rohrer, 2006; Dempster, 1989; Pashler, Rohrer, Cepeda, & Carpenter, 2007; Reynolds & Glaser, 1964; Schmidt &…”
The Effect of Type of Written Exercise on L2 Vocabulary Retention
Folse, K. S. (2006) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/40264523 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: How much is enough?
Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. T. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0023956 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
“practice schedules (Bahrick et al., 1993), four members of the”
Optimizing distributed practice
Cepeda, N. J., Coburn, N., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., Mozer, M. C., & Pashler, H. (2009) · Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.236 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
The effects of interleaved practice
Taylor, K., & Rohrer, D. (2010) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1598 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: Choices and consequences
Pashler, H., Rohrer, D., Cepeda, N. J., & Carpenter, S. K. (2007) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03194050 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
“While the validity of the principle is not in doubt, it seems not to have provided much non-obvious or concrete guidance for practitioners.”
BackgroundMaki, R. H., Maki, W. S., Patterson, M. M., & Whittaker, P. D. (2000) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03207788 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Recent research on human learning challenges conventional instructional strategies
Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2010) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x10374770 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Increased Preclass Preparation Underlies Student Outcome Improvement in the Flipped Classroom
Gross, D. E., Pietri, E. S., Anderson, G., Camihort, K., & Graham, M. J. (2015) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.15-02-0040 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
“Long-standing cognitive psychology research highlights the benefits of spacing out learning activities over time in contrast to blocked learning, for example, short-term cramming in the lead-up to an exam (Bahrick et al., 1993; Son, 2004).”
Background(2010) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(10)53003-2 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
“, Bahrick et al., 1993), retrieval difficulty (e.g., McDaniel et al., 2007), feedback (e.g., Butler, Karpicke, & Roediger, 2007), and retention interval (e.g., Cepeda et al., 2008) can be optimized to produce superior memory. However, the typical focus of spacing and testing research is on memory, not on other kinds o…”
BackgroundThe effects of overlearning and distributed practise on the retention of mathematics knowledge
Rohrer, D., & Taylor, K. (2006) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1266 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics
Baker, R. S., Martin, T., & Rossi, L. M. (2016) · John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118956588.ch16 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
A Typology of Training Design and Work Environment Factors Affecting Workplace Learning and Transfer
Russ-Eft, D. F. (2002) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484302011003 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Effects of Opportunities for Word Retrieval During Second Language Vocabulary Learning
Barcroft, J. (2007) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00398.x · Cited by 164 · see citing works
The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning
Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.530 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
“…apart than when they are massed (Greene, 1989; Johnston & Uhl, 1976; Madigan, 1969; Melton, 1967; Whitten & Bjork, 1977 ; and see especially Bahrick, Bahrick, Bahrick, & Bahrick, 1993, who studied spacing in second language vocabulary learning , and Bjork & Allen, 1970, for theoretical discussion).”
BackgroundThe science of effective learning with spacing and retrieval practice
Carpenter, S. K., Pan, S. C., & Butler, A. C. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00089-1 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Bahrick, H. P., & Hall, L. K. (2005) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.012 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Self-citationNakata, T. (2011) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2010.520675 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
“According to this effect, the larger the intervals between study opportunities for a given item, the better the retention will be (e.g. Baddeley, 1997, pp. 108–114; H. P. Bahrick et al., 1993; H. P. Bahrick & Phelps, 1987; Kornell, 2009).”
The spacing effect in children’s memory and category induction
Vlach, H. A., Sandhofer, C. M., & Kornell, N. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.013 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
The Power of Successive Relearning: Improving Performance on Course Exams and Long-Term Retention
Rawson, K. A., Dunlosky, J., & Sciartelli, S. M. (2013) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-013-9240-4 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
“Given the implications of successive relearning for promoting student learning and the voluminous literatures on testing and spacing more generally, it is surprising that only five other studies have examined successive relearning since Bahrick’s seminal work in 1979 (Bahrick et al. 1993; Bahrick and Hall 2005; Pyc an…”
Ullman, M. T., & Lovelett, J. T. (2016) · Second language Research · doi:10.1177/0267658316675195 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
“A somewhat larger literature has examined spaced repetition in L2 learning, in particular for vocabulary (Bahrick, 1979; Bahrick et al., 1993; Bahrick and Phelps, 1987; Bloom and Shuell, 1981; Kupper-Tetzel et al., 2014).”
BackgroundTHE PSYCHOLOGY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE VOCABULARY ACQUISITION: IMPLICATIONS FOR CALL
Ellis, N. C. (1995) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/0958822940080202 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Time windows in cognitive development.
Rovee‐Collier, C. (1995) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.31.2.147 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Spacing One's Study: Evidence for a Metacognitive Control Strategy.
Son, L. K. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.601 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
“Although typically people have been forced into a massed versus spacing paradigm, acquisition is slower for the spaced items than it is for the massed items (although at final test, the spacing effect still transpires; Bahrick et al., 1993; Simon & Bjork, 2001; Zechmeister & Shaughnessy, 1980).”
BackgroundVlach, H. A., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2012) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01781.x · Cited by 142 · see citing works
An integrated theory for improved skill acquisition and retention in the three stages of learning
Kim, J. W., Ritter, F. E., & Koubek, R. J. (2011) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1464536x.2011.573008 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
“Bahrick et al. (1993) investigated acquisition and retention of English-foreign language word pairs in a 9-year longitudinal study.”
Is Temporal Spacing of Tests Helpful Even When It Inflates Error Rates?
Pashler, H., Zarow, G. J., & Triplett, B. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1051 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
“A number of more recent studies have shown that the advantage of spaced presentations is greater for longer retention intervals (Bahrick, Bahrick, Bahrick, & Bahrick, 1993; Glenberg, 1976; Glenberg & Lehman, 1980).”
BackgroundList learning of second language vocabulary
Griffin, G., & Harley, T. A. (1996) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716400008195 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Divjak, D. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95504-1.01134-0 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Towards a Theory of Learning for Naming Rehabilitation: Retrieval Practice and Spacing Effects
Middleton, E. L., Schwartz, M. F., Rawson, K. A., Traut, H., & Verkuilen, J. (2016) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2016_jslhr-l-15-0303 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
“For example, on tests administered after retention intervals spanning 1 to 5 years, Bahrick et al. (1993) found 13 sessions of training administered every 56 days produced the same level of performance as 26 sessions of training administered every 14 days.”
MethodA Revised Methodology for Research on Metamemory: Pre-judgment Recall And Monitoring (PRAM).
Nelson, T. O., Narens, L., & Dunlosky, J. T. (2004) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.9.1.53 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Verb Learning in Children With SLI
Riches, N. G., Tomasello, M., & Conti‐Ramsden, G. (2005) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/097 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Effects of distributed practice on the acquisition of second language English syntax
BIRD, S. (2010) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716410000172 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
“Conversely, foreign language vocabulary learning has been shown to be beneficially affected by distributed practice (Bahrick et al., 1993; Bloom & Shuell, 1981), and this may reflect the relatively uncomplicated nature of vocabulary learning (e.g., word lists with native language translations;…”
BackgroundThe Effects of Spaced Practice on Second Language Learning: A Meta‐Analysis
Kim, S. K., & Webb, S. (2022) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12479 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Frequency in Language: Memory, Attention and Learning
Divjak, D. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781316084410 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Toppino, T. C., & Gerbier, É. (2013) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800090-8.00004-4 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Improving Students' Evaluation of Informal Arguments
Larson, A. A., Britt, M. A., & Kurby, C. A. (2009) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.3200/jexe.77.4.339-366 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Distributed Learning: Data, Metacognition, and Educational Implications
Son, L. K., & Simon, D. A. (2012) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9206-y · Cited by 114 · see citing works
“While the bulk of the laboratory data have examined learning over extremely short time periods, Bahrick et al. (1993) were the first to have participants commit to a 9-year-long investigation of spacing.”
InfluentialThe effect of distributed practice: Neuroscience, cognition, and education
Gerbier, É., & Toppino, T. C. (2015) · Trends in Neuroscience and Education · doi:10.1016/j.tine.2015.01.001 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Appleton-Knapp, S. L., Bjork, R. A., & Wickens, T. D. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/432236 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Oberg, A., & Daniels, P. (2012) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2011.649484 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Kapler, I. V., Weston, T., & Wiseheart, M. (2015) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.11.001 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
The Testing Effect in the Psychology Classroom: A Meta-Analytic Perspective
Schwieren, J., Barenberg, J., & Dutke, S. (2017) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.1177/1475725717695149 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Event segmentation improves event memory up to one month later.
Flores, S. E., Bailey, H. R., Eisenberg, M. L., & Zacks, J. M. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000367 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
“For example, research on the spacing effect shows that increasing the time between restudy sessions can improve memory, and this benefit can persist for up to eight years (Bahrick, Bahrick, Bahrick, & Bahrick, 1993; Bahrick & Phelphs, 1987; Glenberg & Lehmann, 1980; Pavlik & Anderson, 2005).”
BackgroundThe effect of overlearning on long‐term retention
Rohrer, D., Taylor, K., Pashler, H., Wixted, J. T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2004) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1083 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Cull, W. L., Shaughnessy, J. J., & Zechmeister, E. B. (1996) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.2.4.365 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Multimedia comprehension skill predicts differential outcomes of web-based and lecture courses.
Maki, W. S., & Maki, R. H. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037//1076-898x.8.2.85 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Lexical Input Processing and Vocabulary Learning
Barcroft, J. (2015) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.43 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Nakata, T. (2016) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263116000280 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
“Other L2 vocabulary studies (e.g., Bahrick & Phelps, 1987; Bahrick et al., 1993; Bloom & Shuell, 1981) also found long-term benefits of distributing practice over a longer period of time.”
BackgroundStress and Cognition: A Cognitive Psychological Perspective
Bourne, L. E., & Yaroush, R. A. (2003) · NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Sichletidis, L. T., Spyratos, D. G., Papaioannou, M., Chloros, D. A., Tsiotsios, A. I., Tsagaraki, V., & Haidich, A. (2011) · Primary Care Respiratory Journal · doi:10.4104/pcrj.2011.00038 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Hanson, A. E. S., & Brown, C. M. (2019) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1552975 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
“The effectiveness of spaced-repetition testing for long-term retention of L2 vocabulary has been established through experimental research (Bahrick, Bahrick, Bahrick & Bahrick, 1993; Bloom & Shuell, 1981; Ellis, 1995), yet these powerful experimental demonstrations have not resulted in classroom…”
BackgroundSuccessful Lecturing: Presenting Information in Ways That Engage Effective Processing
deWinstanley, P. A., & Bjork, R. A. (2002) · New Directions for Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1002/tl.44 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
LearningQ: A Large-Scale Dataset for Educational Question Generation
Chen, G., Yang, J., Hauff, C., & Houben, G.-J. (2018) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.14987 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
“Previous research has shown that the number of questions learners receive about a knowledge concept is positively correlated with the effectiveness of knowledge retention (Bahrick et al. 1993).”
BackgroundResearch Commentary: The Effects of Spacing and Mixing Practice Problems
Rohrer, D. (2009) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.40.1.0004 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Augmented Self-Modeling as a Treatment for Children with Selective Mutism
Kehle, T. J., Madaus, M. M. R., Baratta, V. S., & Bray, M. A. (1998) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-4405(98)00013-2 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Spaced cognitive training promotes training transfer.
Wang, Z., Zhou, R., & Shah, P. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00217 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“Likewise, tasks that are adaptive and cognitively challenging may also limit the extent to which task-specific strategies that can be developed.”
BackgroundMeasuring study time distributions: Implications for designing computer-based courses
Taraban, R., Maki, W. S., & Rynearson, K. (1999) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03207718 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
EFFECTS OF MASSING AND SPACING ON THE LEARNING OF SEMANTICALLY RELATED AND UNRELATED WORDS
Nakata, T., & Suzuki, Y. (2019) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263118000219 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
“This adds to existing literature suggesting that spacing facilitates L2 vocabulary learning (e.g., Bahrick et al., 1993; Nakata, 2015; Nakata & Webb, 2016).”
BackgroundResultLearning and Long-Term Retention of Large-Scale Artificial Languages
Frank, M. C., Tenenbaum, J., & Gibson, E. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052500 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“Second, the scale of learning is consistent with previous work on long-term lexical memory [44].”
ResultSpacing Repetitions Over Long Timescales: A Review and a Reconsolidation Explanation
Smith, C., & Scarf, D. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00962 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
“…seem unusual, a close reading of the studies referenced reveals that this finding is very consistent (Keppel, 1964, 1967; Bahrick, 1979; Glenberg and Lehmann, 1980; Bloom and Shuell, 1981; Bahrick et al., 1993; Moss, 1995; Cepeda et al., 2006, 2009; Simone et al., 2013; Suzuki and DeKeyser, 2015).”
ResultA comparative analysis of massed vs. distributed practice on basic math fact fluency growth rates
Schutte, G. M., Duhon, G. J., Solomon, B. G., Poncy, B. C., Moore, K., & Story, B. (2015) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2014.12.003 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Interleaved practice in multi-dimensional learning tasks: Which dimension should we interleave?
Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. (2013) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.07.003 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Spaced vs. massed distribution instruction for L2 grammar learning
Miles, S. W. (2014) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.01.014 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Metacognitive control and the spacing effect.
Son, L. K. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0017892 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
“Studies have, in fact, shown that during spaced study (more than during massed study), not only is acquisition slower but also confidence is lower (Bahrick et al., 1993; Zechmeister & Shaughnessy, 1980).”
BackgroundRodriguez, F., Rivas, M. J., Matsumura, L. H., Warschauer, M., & Sato, B. K. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200767 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
“This has been shown to be effective for long-term learning in a variety of different scenarios, from acquiring and maintaining vocabulary from a foreign language [18] or remembering words on a list [19], among others [20].”
BackgroundImproving Learning Efficiency of Factual Knowledge in Medical Education
Yeh, D. D., & Park, Y. S. (2015) · Journal of surgical education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.03.012 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Chen, O., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09613-w · Cited by 62 · see citing works
The lag effect in secondary school classrooms: Enhancing students’ memory for vocabulary
Kuepper-Tetzel, C. E., Erdfelder, E., & Dickhäuser, O. (2013) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9285-2 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Thai, K.-P., Bang, H. J., & Li, L. (2021) · Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19345747.2021.1969710 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Dynamic internal states shape memory retrievalPreprint
Tarder-Stoll, H., Jayakumar, M., Dimsdale-Zucker, H. R., Günseli, E., & Aly, M. (2019) · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107328 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Spacing Simultaneously Promotes Multiple Forms of Learning in Children's Science Curriculum
Gluckman, M., Vlach, H. A., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2014) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2997 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Does testing with feedback help grade-school children learn key concepts in science?
Lipko, A. R., Dunlosky, J. T., & Rawson, K. A. (2014) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.04.002 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Metacognitive Control: Children's Short-Term Versus Long-Term Study Strategies
Son, L. K. (2005) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.3200/genp.132.4.347-364 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“More specifically, people choose to mass items that are judged as difficult and space items that are judged as easy, which supports the assumption that people choose to study an item until it is fully encoded, and only until fully encoded (Bahrick et al., 1993; Simon & Bjork, 2001).”
BackgroundNovikoff, T. P., Kleinberg, J. M., & Strogatz, S. H. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1109863109 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Callan, D. E., & Schweighofer, N. (2010) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20894 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
“Indeed, forgetting is known to be faster after massed practice [Bahrick et al., 1993; Pavlik and Anderson, 2005].”
BackgroundCannon‐Bowers, J. A., Bowers, C. A., & Procci, K. (2010) · Surgical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.suc.2010.02.006 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Effect of Massed Versus Interleaved Teaching Method on Performance of Students in Radiology
Rozenshtein, A., Pearson, G. D. N., Yan, S. X., Liu, A. Z., & Toy, D. (2016) · Journal of the American College of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2016.03.031 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Maddox, G. B. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2016.1181637 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
The time window hypothesis: Spacing effects
Rovee‐Collier, C., Evancio, S., & Earley, L. A. (1995) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/0163-6383(95)90008-x · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., Rummel, N., & Pardos, Z. A. (2013) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-013-0011-7 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Koval, N. G. (2019) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716419000158 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Confidence judgments in real classroom settings: Monitoring performance in different types of tests
Filho, M. K. D. C. (2008) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00207590701436744 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Déjà Vu All Over Again: Effects of Reenactment on Toddlers' Event Memory
Hudson, J. A., & Sheffield, E. G. (1998) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06132.x · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Walsh, M. M., Gluck, K. A., Glenn Gunzelmann, A., Jastrzembski, T. S., & Krusmark, M. (2018) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12602 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Ellis, L. A. (2005) · ACEReSearch Repository (Australian Council for Educational Research) · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Spacing Effects on Learning and Memory ☆
Carpenter, S. K. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.21054-7 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Developing an intelligent tool for computer-assisted formulaic language learning from YouTube videos
Lin, P. (2021) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344021000252 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“Informed by Bahrick et al.’s (1993) experimental findings, the system has been set to provide 13 repetitions at 14-day intervals.”
Method
- Authors
- Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, L. E., Bahrick, A. S., & Bahrick, P. E.
- Affiliations
- Ohio Wesleyan University (US)
- Florida International University (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- Ohio Wesieyan University
- Corresponding author
- Bahrick, Harry P.
- ORCID
- Bahrick, Lorraine E.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 316-321
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2132404624
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Florida International University Digital Commons (Florida International University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- foreign language vocabulary, spacing effect, retention, relearning, spaced retrieval practice, long-term maintenance, word learning, retrieval consistency, vocabulary difficulty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review