Student engagement with teacher written feedback: Insights from low-proficiency and high-proficiency L2 learners
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581 · see citing works
Handbook of Research on Student Engagement
(2012) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7 · Cited by 3,050 · see citing works
Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing
Zhang, Z. (., & Hyland, K. (2018) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004 · Cited by 546 · see citing works
Koltovskaia, S. (2020) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Classroom Writing Assessment and Feedback in L2 School Contexts
Lee, I. (2017) · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3924-9 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Zhang, T., Chen, X., Hu, J., & Ketwan, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660564 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2024) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101337 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationHuang, J., & Teng, M. F. (2025) · Digital Applied Linguistics · doi:10.29140/dal.v2.102469 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cheng, X., & Liu, Y.
- Affiliations
- Hubei University of Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Cheng, Xiaolong
- Venue
- System
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-10
- Volume
- 109
- Pages
- 102880
- ISSN
- 0346-251X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4291295736
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 49.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- System (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- teacher written feedback, student engagement, emotional engagement, cognitive engagement, behavioral engagement, language proficiency, second language writing, local feedback, global feedback, EFL writing, Chinese learners of English
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
