Cited by 4Second Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningReading and Literacy Development

Incidental development of implicit and explicit grammar knowledge from reading: The case of lower-intermediate learners of English

Ward, Donald F.B., Lo, Yuen Yi·2023·System

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.system.2023.103094

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jean, 2011, Grammar learning in English and French L2: Students' and teachers' beliefs and perceptions, Foreign Language Annals, 44, 465
  2. Schmidt, 1994, Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics, AILA Review, 11, 11

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Ward, D. F. B., & Lo, Y. Y.
Affiliations
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Lo, Yuen Yi
Venue
System
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
116
Pages
103094
ISSN
0346-251X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4382247716
Cited by
4
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
System (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Hong Kong
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
reading, explicit grammar knowledge, implicit grammar knowledge, English as a second language, lower-intermediate learners, grammaticality judgment, second language acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review