The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrating technology into teacher education: How online discussion can be used to develop informed and critical literacy teachers
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“An additional technology-related element leading to impact was the ease of use of online tools (Hollingsworth and Lim 2015;Ryan and Scott 2008;Teo and Wong 2013), that enhanced participation and effective online discussion.”
From COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices (2020) · cites this paper as Ryan and Scott 2008
Citations
Cites
Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1989) · Biochemical Education · doi:10.1016/0307-4412(89)90094-0 · Cited by 4,839
Langenberg, D. N. (2000) · Cited by 4,305
Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of State Policy Evidence
Darling‐Hammond, L. (2000) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · Cited by 2,801
Implication of Research on Teacher Belief
Kagan, D. M. (1992) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2701_6 · Cited by 1,873
Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1996) · Cited by 1,655
Learning to Read: The Great Debate
Williams, J. P., & Chall, J. (1969) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1161900 · Cited by 1,481
Swan, K. (2001) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/0158791010220208 · Cited by 1,016
Images of teaching: Student teachers' early conceptions of classroom practice
Calderhead, J., & Robson, M. (1991) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/0742-051x(91)90053-r · Cited by 828
Learning to Read: The Great Debate
LaBrant, L. (1968) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · Cited by 423
Kardash, C. M., & Scholes, R. J. (1996) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0663.88.2.260 · Cited by 377
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Salmon, G. (2002). Online Learning Workshop. Paper presented at the ACEC 2002 conference proceedings, Hobart.
Cited by
COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices
Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184 · Cited by 1,019
Learning methods for teacher education: the use of online discussions to improve critical thinking
Szabo, Z., & Schwartz, J. (2011) · Technology, Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2010.534866 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Ryan, J., & Scott, A.
- Affiliations
- Australian Catholic University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Ryan, Josephine
- Venue
- Teaching and Teacher Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1635-1644
- ISSN
- 0742-051X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169419113
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 15.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Teaching and Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
- Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Keywords
- online discourse, pre-service teachers, literacy teacher education, critical literacy, large cohorts, instructor expertise, technology integration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating technology into teacher education: How online discussion can be used to develop informed and critical literacy teachers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.012
- The paper
- Ryan, J., & Scott, A. (2008). Integrating technology into teacher education: How online discussion can be used to develop informed and critical literacy teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
