Effects of preexisiting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues.
Abstract
This study examined the influence of people's beliefs about the certainty of knowledge, the strength of their beliefs about a controversial issue, and their tendency to enjoy effortful thinking on their interpretation of controversial information. Ninety-six undergraduates completed an epistemological beliefs questionnaire (M. Schommer, 1990), the Need for Cognition Scale (J. T. Cacioppo, R. E. Petty, & C. F. Kao, 1984), and indicated the degree to which they believed that HIV causes AIDS. They then read a text that presented two conflicting views regarding the HIV-AIDS relationship and wrote a concluding paragraph for the text. Regression analyses revealed that the less students believed in certain knowledge, the less extreme their initial beliefs, and the higher their need for cognition, the more likely they were to write conclusions that reflected the inconclusive nature of the mixed evidence they read.
Cites (4)
- “The Need for Cognition.”Cacioppo, John T., Petty, Richard E. · 1982 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidenceLord, Charles G., Ross, Lee, Lepper, Mark R. · 1979 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Is memory schematicAlba, Joseph W., Hasher, Lynn · 1983 · Psychological Bulletin
- The attitude polarization phenomenon: Role of response measure, attitude extremity, and behavioral consequences of reported attitude change.Miller, Arthur G., McHoskey, John W., Bane, Cynthia M., Dowd, Timothy G. · 1993 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cited by (16)
- Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Published Research: Common Errors and Some Comment on Improved PracticeHenson, Robin K., Roberts, J. Kyle · 2006 · Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on LearningSchraw, Gregory, Crippen, Kent J., Hartley, Kendall · 2006 · Research in Science Education
- Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learningChan, Kwok-Wai, Elliott, Robert G. · 2004 · Teaching and Teacher Education
- Expanding the Dimensions of Epistemic Cognition: Arguments From Philosophy and PsychologyCHINN, CLARK A., BUCKLAND, LUKE A., SAMARAPUNGAVAN, ALA · 2011 · Educational Psychologist
- Heuristics and biases as measures of critical thinking: Associations with cognitive ability and thinking dispositions.West, Richard F., Toplak, Maggie E., Stanovich, Keith E. · 2008 · Journal of Educational Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of preexisiting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-0663.88.2.260
- The paper
- Kardash, C. M., & Scholes, R. J. (1996). Effects of preexisiting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.88.2.260
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.