Cited by 257Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesTeacher Education and AssessmentsSchool Choice and Performance

More or better student teaching?

Ronfeldt, Matthew, Reininger, Michelle·2012·Teaching and Teacher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tate.2012.06.003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ronfeldt, M., & Reininger, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Ronfeldt, Matthew
Venue
Teaching and Teacher Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
28
Issue
8
Pages
1091-1106
ISSN
0742-051X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994301784
Cited by
257
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11
FWCI
66.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Teaching and Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
student teaching, teacher preparation, teacher self-efficacy, teacher career plans, underserved students, urban schools, pre-service teachers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review