Cited by 242Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesTeacher Professional Development and MotivationTeacher Education and Assessments

A closer look at the role of mentor teachers in shaping preservice teachers' professional identity

Izadinia, Mahsa·2015·Teaching and Teacher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tate.2015.08.003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Izadinia, M.
Affiliations
Edith Cowan University (AU)
Corresponding author
Izadinia, Mahsa
Venue
Teaching and Teacher Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
52
Pages
1-10
ISSN
0742-051X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1159094888
Cited by
242
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 7
FWCI
67.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Teaching and Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Edith Cowan University Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
Keywords
cooperating teachers, pre-service teachers, professional identity, mentoring relationships, teacher professional development, teacher placement, teacher confidence, reflective practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review