Cited by 45Educational Assessment and ImprovementDigital literacy in educationTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

Changes in educators' data literacy during a data-based decision making intervention

Open access
van Geel, Marieke, Keuning, Trynke, Visscher, Adrie, Fox, Jean-Paul·2017·Teaching and Teacher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 45

Authors
van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Visscher, A., & Fox, J.-P.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • University of Twente (NL)
Venue
Teaching and Teacher Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
64
Pages
187-198
ISSN
0742-051X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2593062439
Cited by
45
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Teaching and Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
data literacy, data-driven decision making, educators, student monitoring system, school improvement, educational data, teacher professional development, school leaders, knowledge gaps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review