Cited by 18Gender, Sexuality, and EducationGender Studies in LanguageGender and Feminist Studies

Sexual orientation in Norwegian science textbooks: Heteronormativity and selective inclusion in textbooks and teaching

Røthing, Åse·2017·Teaching and Teacher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.005

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Røthing, Å.
Affiliations
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO)
Corresponding author
Røthing, Åse
Venue
Teaching and Teacher Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
67
Pages
143-151
ISSN
0742-051X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2626219297
Cited by
18
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Teaching and Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
sexual orientation, science textbooks, heteronormativity, sex education, othering, national curriculum, inclusive education, anti-oppressive pedagogy, contraceptives, sexually transmitted infections, Norwegian education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review