Cited by 165Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesReflective Practices in EducationStudent Assessment and Feedback

Promoting pre-service teachers' professional vision of classroom management during practical school training: Effects of a structured online- and video-based self-reflection and feedback intervention

Weber, Kira Elena, Gold, Bernadette, Prilop, Christopher Neil, Kleinknecht, Marc·2018·Teaching and Teacher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.008

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Weber, K. E., Gold, B., Prilop, C. N., & Kleinknecht, M.
Affiliations
  • Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
  • University of Erfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Weber, Kira Elena
Venue
Teaching and Teacher Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
76
Pages
39-49
ISSN
0742-051X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2888524687
Cited by
165
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7
FWCI
39.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Teaching and Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Leuphana University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
pre-service teachers, teaching practicum, peer feedback, expert feedback, classroom management, video-based assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review