The DOI matches its Crossref record; 169 of the 169 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of Blockchain Technology applications for financial services
Open accessAbstract
Financial service providers find blockchain technology useful to enhance authenticity, security, and risk management. Several institutions are adopting blockchain in trade and finance systems to build smart contracts between participants, improve efficiency and transparency, and open up newer revenue opportunities. Blockchain’s unique recording capabilities make the existing clearing and settlement process redundant. Banks and other financial entities are adopting blockchain-enabled IDs to identify people. Better results come from organisations’ capacity to foresee emerging trends in financial blockchain applications and develop blockchain functionality. The transfer of asset ownership and addressing the maintenance of a precise financial ledger. Measurement, communication, and analysis of financial information are three significant areas to be focussed on by accounting professionals. Blockchain clarifies asset ownership and the existence of obligations for accountants, and it has the potential to improve productivity. This paper identifies and studies relevant articles related to blockchain for finance. This paper focuses on Blockchain technology and its importance for financial services. Further takes up various tools, strategies, and featured services in Blockchain-based financial services. Finally, the paper identifies and evaluates the significant applications of Blockchain technology in financial services. Credit reports significantly impact the financial lives of customers. Recent data breaches demonstrate the superior security of blockchain-based credit reporting over conventional server-based reporting. Blockchain-based systems enable the faster, more cost-effective, and more customised issuance of digital securities. With its adoption, the market for investors can be expanded, costs for issuers can be reduced, and counterparty risk can be reduced due to the ability to customise digital financial instruments to the demands of investors. It uses mutualised standards, protocols, and shared procedures to give network users a single common source of truth. Participants in the business network can now more easily collaborate, manage data, and agree with this technology’s application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
4 retracted
Blockchain in supply chain management: a review, bibliometric, and network analysis
Moosavi, J., Naeni, L. M., Fathollahi-Fard, A. M., & Fiore, U. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-021-13094-3 · Cited by 290
RetractedRETRACTED ARTICLE: Blockchain-based intelligent contract for factoring business in supply chains
Zheng, K., Zhang, Z., & Gauthier, J. (2020) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-020-03601-z · Cited by 56
RetractedZhao, Y. (2020) · EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking · doi:10.1186/s13638-020-01819-w · Cited by 27
RetractedRisk Assessment and Analysis in Supply Chain Finance Based on Blockchain Technology
Meng, X. L. (2022) · Journal of Sensors · doi:10.1155/2022/1985803 · Cited by 19
RetractedBlockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey
Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H. N., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2018) · International Journal of Web and Grid Services · doi:10.1504/ijwgs.2018.095647 · Cited by 3,651
Dutta, P., Choi, T.-M., Somani, S., & Butala, R. (2020) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.102067 · Cited by 1,545
Blockchain application and outlook in the banking industry
Guo, Y., & Liang, C. (2016) · Financial Innovation · doi:10.1186/s40854-016-0034-9 · Cited by 966
Digital Supply Chain Transformation toward Blockchain Integration
Korpela, K., Hallikas, J., & Dahlberg, T. (2017) · Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2017.506 · Cited by 851
Blockchain disruption and decentralized finance: The rise of decentralized business models
Chen, Y., & Bellavitis, C. (2020) · Journal of Business Venturing Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jbvi.2019.e00151 · Cited by 793
Exploring blockchain technology and its potential applications for education
Chen, G., Xu, B., Lu, M., & Chen, N.-S. (2018) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-017-0050-x · Cited by 753
Cited by
Blockchain Technology in Financial Accounting: Enhancing Transparency, Security, and ESG Reporting
Almadadha, R. (2024) · Blockchains · doi:10.3390/blockchains2030015 · Cited by 74
Segbenya, M., Bervell, B., Frimpong-Manso, E., Otoo, I. C., Andzie, T. A., & Achina, S. (2023) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100188 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Suman, R., & Khan, S.
- Venue
- BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-07
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 100073
- ISSN
- 2772-4859 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4307139962
- Cited by
- 470
- References
- 169
- FWCI
- 95.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of Blockchain Technology applications for financial services. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tbench.2022.100073
- The paper
- Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Suman, R., & Khan, S. (2022). A review of Blockchain Technology applications for financial services. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2022.100073
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.