The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
Rigor in Qualitative Research: The Assessment of Trustworthiness
Krefting, L. (1991) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.45.3.214 · Cited by 4,174
Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use
Fink, A., Kosecoff, J., Chassin, M., & Brook, R. H. (1984) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.74.9.979 · Cited by 2,089
A Psychometric Toolbox for Testing Validity and Reliability
DeVon, H. A., Block, M. E., Moyle‐Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J., Lazzara, D. J., Savoy, S. M., & Kostas‐Polston, E. (2007) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x · Cited by 1,889
Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research
Kirk, J., & Miller, M. (1986) · doi:10.4135/9781412985659 · Cited by 1,462
Advanced Design in Nursing Research
Brink, P., & Wood, M. (1998) · doi:10.4135/9781452204840 · Cited by 433
Considering the implication of variations within Delphi research
Thompson, M. (2009) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/cmp051 · Cited by 82
Cited by
Powell, B. J., Waltz, T. J., Chinman, M. J., Damschroder, L. J., Smith, J. L., Matthieu, M. M., Proctor, E. K., & Kirchner, J. E. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1 · Cited by 4,963
Rosenzweig, C., Elliott, J., Deryng, D., Ruane, A. C., Müller, C., Arneth, A., Boote, K. J., Folberth, C., Glotter, M., Khabarov, N., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1222463110 · Cited by 2,319
Jünger, S., Payne, S. A., Brine, J., Radbruch, L., & Brearley, S. G. (2017) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216317690685 · Cited by 2,210
Consensus measurement in Delphi studies
von der Gracht, H. A. (2012) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013 · Cited by 1,831
Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map
Niederberger, M., & Spranger, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00457 · Cited by 1,072
Metadata
- Authors
- Hasson, F., & Keeney, S.
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1695-1704
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025170215
- Cited by
- 760
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 47.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
