Cited by 2,089Delphi Technique in ResearchReliability and Agreement in MeasurementMulti-Criteria Decision Making

Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use

Fink, A, Kosecoff, J, Chassin, M, Brook, R H·1984·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Consensus methods are being used increasingly to solve problems in medicine and health. Their main purpose is to define levels of agreement on controversial subjects. Advocates suggest that, when properly employed, consensus strategies can create structured environments in which experts are given the best available information, allowing their solutions to problems to be more justifiable and credible than otherwise. This paper surveys the characteristics of several major methods (Delphi, Nominal Group, and models developed by the National Institutes of Health and Glaser) and provides guidelines for those who want to use the techniques. Among the concerns these guidelines address are selecting problems, choosing members for consensus panels, specifying acceptable levels of agreement, properly using empirical data, obtaining professional and political support, and disseminating results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.74.9.979

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fink, A., Kosecoff, J., Chassin, M., & Brook, R. H.
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
1984-09
Volume
74
Issue
9
Pages
979-983
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2168909631
Cited by
2,089
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 119 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 106 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 112 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 93 · 2016: 84 · 2015: 90 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 71
FWCI
55.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Keywords
consensus methods, Delphi method, nominal group technique, expert panel, health policy decision-making
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Delphi Technique, Humans, Methods, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Research Design, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review