The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The digital transformation of external audit and its impact on corporate governance
Abstract
Abstract The literature demonstrates the growing interest of digitalization in organizations. The purpose of this paper is to study the influence of digitalization on audit’s business and to understand how it can improve the role of audit as a governance mechanism. A qualitative approach was conducted by interviewing auditors from the five largest auditing firms in France. This paper demonstrates that digital technology is impacting at five key levels audit firms especially the audit role as a governance mechanism. Digitalization will improve the audit relevance (1) allowing audit firms to extend their offers by proposing new services (2). It will also improve the audit quality mainly by analysing all data’s customer (3). Finally, with the digitalization a new auditor profile emerges (4), enabling the culture of innovation within audit firms (5). Thus, the firm governance will be improved but the managers ‘discretionary power will be limited. This research highlights the importance of implementing digital strategies to provide regulators with the necessary modifications that need to occur for audit standards. It should enable Business School and universities to adapt their training programs according to the audit firms’ expectations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x · Cited by 71,491
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
(1994) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80231-2 · Cited by 48,420
(2010) · Cited by 24,023
Basics of Qualitative Research
Ozanne, J. L., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172751 · Cited by 17,850
Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1985) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 5,838
A review of archival auditing research
DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002 · Cited by 3,188
Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World
Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2017/41:1.03 · Cited by 2,967
How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Competition
Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014) · Harvard business review · Cited by 2,600
Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts
Kitchin, R. (2014) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951714528481 · Cited by 2,355
Gillham, B. (2000) · Cited by 2,100
Cited by
Grover, P., Kar, A. K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-020-03683-9 · Cited by 419
Explaining the (non-)adoption of advanced data analytics in auditing: A process theory
Krieger, F., Drews, P., & Velte, P. (2021) · International Journal of Accounting Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2021.100511 · Cited by 133
Digital transformation and the public sector auditing: The SAI’s perspective
Otia, J. E., & Bracci, E. (2022) · Financial Accountability & Management · doi:10.1111/faam.12317 · Cited by 124
Yang, J., Amrollahi, A., & Marrone, M. (2024) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2024.101864 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Manita, R., Elommal, N., Baudier, P., & Hikkerova, L.
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 150
- Pages
- 119751
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2986150074
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 77.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.