Boosting the EU forest-based bioeconomy: market, climate, and employment impacts
Open accessAbstract
This study adds to the scientific literature dealing with the climate change mitigation implications of wood substitution. Its main scientific contribution rests with the modelling approach. By fully integrating forest resource and wood-product markets modelling in quantitative scenario analysis, we account for international trade in wood products as well as impacts on EU forests and forest-based sector employment of an increased EU uptake of wood-based construction and/or biochemicals and biofuels. Our results confirm the crucial role of the sawmilling industry in the forest-based bioeconomy. Thus, boosting wood-based construction in the EU would be most effective in increasing EU production and employment—in logging and solid wood-products manufacturing, but also in sectors using sawmilling by-products as feedstock. Vertical integration in wood-based biorefineries should thus be advantageous. The positive EU climate-change mitigation effects of increased carbon storage in harvested wood products (HWP) and material substitution from increased wood\nconstruction are more than offset by reduced net forests carbon sinks by 2030, due to increased EU harvests. Further, increased EU imports, resulting in lower consumption of sawnwood outside the EU, would reduce extra-EU long-life HWP carbon storage and substitution of GHG-intensive materials, highlighting the need for concerted international climate change mitigation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Increasing demand for wood-based products might generate trade-offs affecting biomass availability, forest ecosystem services, and the climate change mitigation potential of forests.
“However, the increasing demand 40 for wood-based products might also generate trade-offs, affecting biomass availability, forest 41 ecosystem services, and the climate change mitigation potential of forests (Jonsson et al., 2021).”
From Design strategies to increase the reuse of wood materials in buildings: Lessons from architectural practice (2022) · cites this paper as Jonsson et al., 2021
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 54 · Cited by 118
- Authors
- Jonsson, R., Rinaldi, F., Pilli, R., Fiorese, G., Hurmekoski, E., Cazzaniga, N., Robert, N., & Camia, A.
- Affiliations
- European Commission (BE)
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Jonsson, Ragnar
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 163
- Pages
- 120478
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3110201291
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 11 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 27.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
- Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Joint Research Centre
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
- Keywords
- forest-based bioeconomy, wood substitute, wood-based construction, climate change mitigation, harvested wood products, carbon storage, sawmill industry, forest employment, biorefinery, vertical integration, international climate policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review