What are the leading factors for using Spanish peer-to-peer mobile payment platform Bizum? The applied analysis of the UTAUT2 model
Open accessAbstract
The main goal of this paper is to determine the underlying factors that drive the adoption of the Bizum mobile peer-to-peer payment system by users. It is empirically proven that factors included in the extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) model are precursors of the mobile payment adoption. The proposed model modifies the set of constructs by adding trust, security, and perceived risk. The sample consist of 334 Bizum platform users who are mainly young people between 18 and 22 years old. Obtained data was analyzed by a Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The results show that the strongest predictor for adopting to use Bizum mobile payment platform is habit, with 75 % of acceptance of young online banking users. But habit and social influence factors show 82.5 % of intention of use among young users. In contrary, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, facilitating conditions, price-value, hedonic motivation, trust, security, and perceived risk do not influence the intention to use this platform. Banks, financial entities, as well as banking platform developers, can benefit from the results of this study by understanding the factors that influence users to use these platforms and consequently successfully implement them.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hedonic motivation has been found to have a significant influence on user trust and behavioral intention in various contexts, including mobile payments, smartphones, e-health applications, e-banking, and e-commerce platforms.
“Hedonic motivation, which refers to the pleasure or enjoyment derived from using technology, has been found to have a significant influence on user trust and behavioral intention in various contexts, including mobile payments, smartphones, e-health applications, e-banking, and e-commerce platforms [1,33,39,49-53].”
Trust in technology plays a crucial role in users' adoption and use of the platform economy, especially in situations of risk and uncertainty.
“Trust in technology plays a crucial role in users' adoption and use of the platform economy, especially in situations of risk and uncertainty [3,33,63].”
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · see citing works
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace <sup>1</sup>
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x · Cited by 6,231 · see citing works
Scale Development Research: A Content Analysis and Recommendations for Best Practices
Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000006288127 · Cited by 4,087 · see citing works
The Analysis of Covariance Structures: Goodness-of-Fit Indices
HOELTER, J. W. (1983) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124183011003003 · Cited by 1,624 · see citing works
Baptista, G., & Oliveira, T. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.024 · Cited by 922 · see citing works
Beldad, A., de Jong, M., & Steehouder, M. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.013 · Cited by 754 · see citing works
Arfi, W. B., Nasr, I. B., Kondrateva, G., & Hikkerova, L. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120688 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
An extended UTAUT model to explain the adoption of mobile banking
Bhatiasevi, V. (2016) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/0266666915570764 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Abu-Taieh, E. M., AlHadid, I., Abu-Tayeh, S., Masa’deh, R., Alkhawaldeh, R. S., Khwaldeh, S., & Alrowwad, A. (2022) · Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity · doi:10.3390/joitmc8030120 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding the Determinants of FinTech Adoption: Integrating UTAUT2 with Trust Theoretic Model
Amnas, M. B., Selvam, M., Raja, M., Santhoshkumar, S., & Parayitam, S. (2023) · Journal of Risk and Financial Management · doi:10.3390/jrfm16120505 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Dahmani, M., & Ben Youssef, A. (2023) · Platforms · doi:10.3390/platforms1010005 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- de Blanes Sebastián, M. G., Antonovica, A., & Sarmiento Guede, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Antonovica, Arta
- Venue
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-02
- Volume
- 187
- Pages
- 122235
- ISSN
- 0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4311155337
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 17
- FWCI
- 15.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Technological Forecasting and Social Change (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- BURJC Digital (King Juan Carlos University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
- Keywords
- peer-to-peer payments, mobile payment adoption, UTAUT2, technology acceptance, habit, social influence, trust, perceived security, risk perception, young users, intention to use, internet banking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review