Cited by 86Technology Adoption and User BehaviourHealth, Technology, Consumer BehaviorFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance

What are the leading factors for using Spanish peer-to-peer mobile payment platform Bizum? The applied analysis of the UTAUT2 model

Open access
de Blanes Sebastián, María García, Antonovica, Arta, Sarmiento Guede, José Ramón·2023·Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Abstract

The main goal of this paper is to determine the underlying factors that drive the adoption of the Bizum mobile peer-to-peer payment system by users. It is empirically proven that factors included in the extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) model are precursors of the mobile payment adoption. The proposed model modifies the set of constructs by adding trust, security, and perceived risk. The sample consist of 334 Bizum platform users who are mainly young people between 18 and 22 years old. Obtained data was analyzed by a Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The results show that the strongest predictor for adopting to use Bizum mobile payment platform is habit, with 75 % of acceptance of young online banking users. But habit and social influence factors show 82.5 % of intention of use among young users. In contrary, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, facilitating conditions, price-value, hedonic motivation, trust, security, and perceived risk do not influence the intention to use this platform. Banks, financial entities, as well as banking platform developers, can benefit from the results of this study by understanding the factors that influence users to use these platforms and consequently successfully implement them.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122235

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Blanes Sebastián, M. G., Antonovica, A., & Sarmiento Guede, J. R.
Affiliations
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES)
Corresponding author
Antonovica, Arta
Venue
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-02
Volume
187
Pages
122235
ISSN
0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4311155337
Cited by
86
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 17
FWCI
15.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • BURJC Digital (King Juan Carlos University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Keywords
peer-to-peer payments, mobile payment adoption, UTAUT2, technology acceptance, habit, social influence, trust, perceived security, risk perception, young users, intention to use, internet banking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review