Cited by 582Innovation and Knowledge ManagementBusiness Strategy and InnovationOpen Source Software Innovations

The Open Innovation Journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm

Chiaroni, Davide, Chiesa, Vittorio, Frattini, Federico·2011·Technovation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.007

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F.
Affiliations
Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Corresponding author
Chiaroni, Davide
Venue
Technovation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
34-43
ISSN
0166-4972 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039915958
Cited by
582
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 24
FWCI
45.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Technovation (publishedVersion)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
Keywords
open innovation, innovation management, closed innovation, organizational change, cement industry, innovation networks, organizational structure, knowledge management systems, evaluation process, institutionalization of innovation, high-tech industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review