The Open Innovation Journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Innovative behavior has a positive effect on organizational innovation.
“In addition, many other studies have demonstrated that innovative behavior has a positive effect on organizational innovation [141-149].”
From A Study on the Effect of Change Management on Organizational Innovation: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Members’ Innovative Behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [149]
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942 · see citing works
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324 · see citing works
Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software
West, J., & Gallagher, S. (2006) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00436.x · Cited by 1,136 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As an emerging paradigm for managing and understanding innovation processes, Open Innovation has been among the most debated topics by management scholars in the last years (Christensen et al., 2005; Dodgson et al., 2006; Gassmann, 2006; Vanhaverbeke, 2006; West and Gallagher, 2006).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sung, W., & Kim, C. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13042079 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
ICTs in the transformation of rural enterprises in China: A multi-layer perspective
Zhou, Q., Gao, P., & Chimhowu, A. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.026 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F.
- Affiliations
- Politecnico di Milano (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Chiaroni, Davide
- Venue
- Technovation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-43
- ISSN
- 0166-4972 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039915958
- Cited by
- 582
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 45.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Technovation (publishedVersion)
- Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
- Keywords
- open innovation, innovation management, closed innovation, organizational change, cement industry, innovation networks, organizational structure, knowledge management systems, evaluation process, institutionalization of innovation, high-tech industry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review