Cited by 555Technology Adoption and User BehaviourHealth, Technology, Consumer BehaviorPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

A cross-cultural study of the intention to use mobile banking between Lebanese and British consumers: Extending UTAUT2 with security, privacy and trust

Open access
Merhi, Mohamed, Hone, Kate, Tarhini, Ali·2019·Technology in Society

Abstract

This study aims to examine the key factors that may hinder or facilitate the adoption of mobile banking services in a cross-cultural context. A conceptual framework was developed through extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology UTAUT2 by incorporating three additional constructs, namely trust (TR), security (PS) and privacy (PP). Data were collected using an online survey and a self-administrated questionnaire from 901 mobile banking users who were either Lebanese or English. These were analysed using structural equation modelling based on AMOS 23.0. The results of this analysis indicated that behavioural intention towards adoption of mobile banking services was influenced by habit (HB), perceived security (PS), perceived privacy (PP) and trust (TR) for both the Lebanese and English consumers. In addition, performance expectancy (PE) was a significant predictor in Lebanon but not in England; whereas price value (PV) was significant in England but not in Lebanon. Contrary to our expectation, Social Influence (SI) and Hedonic Motivations (HM) were insignificant for both the Lebanese and English consumers. Overall, the proposed model achieved acceptable fit and explained 78% of the variance for the Lebanese sample and 83% for the English sample – both of which are higher than that of the original UTAUT2. These findings are expected to help policy makers and bank directors understand the issues facing mobile banking adoption in different cultural settings. Subsequently, they will help guide them in formulating appropriate strategies to improve the uptake of mobile banking activities. As the low mobile banking adoption rate in Lebanon can be attributed to the novelty of this technology, the Lebanese banking sector stands to greatly benefit from this study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101151

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Merhi, M., Hone, K., & Tarhini, A.
Affiliations
  • Brunel University of London (GB)
  • Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
Corresponding author
Tarhini, Ali
Venue
Technology in Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
59
Pages
101151
ISSN
0160-791X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2961553619
Cited by
555
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 5
FWCI
60.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Technology in Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
mobile banking, technology adoption, UTAUT2, behavioral intention, perceived security, perceived privacy, trust, habit, performance expectancy, price value, cross-cultural comparison, Lebanese consumers, UK consumers, banking sector

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review