Rethinking digital financial inclusion: Evidence from Bangladesh
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
A growing body of literature is advancing the impact of financial inclusion and digital finance on marginalized populations. However, mainstream scholarship has not focused on understanding the potential drivers and challenges of digital approaches to financial inclusion. This study aims to investigate the mismatch between assumptions implicit in the financial inclusion discourse and ideas of access and use of digital technologies and seeks to move the discourse forward through a comprehensive framework for digital financial inclusion. Our study showed that the social dynamics of financial engagement with new technologies require a move beyond a simple individualistic adopter/non-adopter binary framework and ‘supply oriented’ financial infrastructure. We conclude that although digital services have eased and bridged the gap of physical access to financial services, such services have not been utilised due to lack of basic connectivity, financial literacy and social awareness. This article theoretically contributes to digital financial services adoption literature by offering a significant critical overview and a new perspective on both digital finance and financial inclusion mechanisms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although digital services have improved access to financial services, these services have not been fully utilized due to a lack of basic connectivity, financial literacy, and social awareness.
“Aziz and Naima (2021) concluded that although digital services have improved the access to financial services, these services have not been fully utilized due to a lack of basic connectivity, financial literacy, and social awareness [89].”
From Digital financial inclusion and quality of economic growth (2023) · cites this paper as [89]
Cites
Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology
Portes, A. (1998) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1 · Cited by 12,037 · see citing works
Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills
Hargittai, E. (2002) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v7i4.942 · Cited by 1,951 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital financial literacy and financial well-being
Choung, Y., Chatterjee, S., & Pak, T.-Y. (2023) · Finance research letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2023.104438 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Digital financial inclusion and quality of economic growth
Xi, W., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19731 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
“Aziz and Naima (2021) concluded that although digital services have improved the access to financial services, these services have not been fully utilized due to a lack of basic connectivity, financial literacy, and social awareness [89].”
- Authors
- Aziz, A., & Naima, U.
- Affiliations
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- International Islamic University Chittagong (BD)
- Corresponding author
- Aziz, Abdul
- Venue
- Technology in Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 64
- Pages
- 101509
- ISSN
- 0160-791X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3119773245
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 56 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 6
- FWCI
- 44.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Technology in Society (publishedVersion)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Funders
- Fordham University
- King Abdulaziz University
- University of Queensland
- Swinburne University of Technology
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Economic Growth and Development
- Keywords
- digital financial inclusion, digital finance, financial inclusion, marginalized communities, digital technology adoption, financial literacy, internet access, financial infrastructure, Bangladesh
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review