Cited by 373Microfinance and Financial InclusionFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital FinanceEconomic Growth and Development

Rethinking digital financial inclusion: Evidence from Bangladesh

Open access
Aziz, Abdul, Naima, Umma·2021·Technology in Society

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

A growing body of literature is advancing the impact of financial inclusion and digital finance on marginalized populations. However, mainstream scholarship has not focused on understanding the potential drivers and challenges of digital approaches to financial inclusion. This study aims to investigate the mismatch between assumptions implicit in the financial inclusion discourse and ideas of access and use of digital technologies and seeks to move the discourse forward through a comprehensive framework for digital financial inclusion. Our study showed that the social dynamics of financial engagement with new technologies require a move beyond a simple individualistic adopter/non-adopter binary framework and ‘supply oriented’ financial infrastructure. We conclude that although digital services have eased and bridged the gap of physical access to financial services, such services have not been utilised due to lack of basic connectivity, financial literacy and social awareness. This article theoretically contributes to digital financial services adoption literature by offering a significant critical overview and a new perspective on both digital finance and financial inclusion mechanisms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101509

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although digital services have improved access to financial services, these services have not been fully utilized due to a lack of basic connectivity, financial literacy, and social awareness.

    “Aziz and Naima (2021) concluded that although digital services have improved the access to financial services, these services have not been fully utilized due to a lack of basic connectivity, financial literacy, and social awareness [89].”

    From Digital financial inclusion and quality of economic growth (2023) · cites this paper as [89]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aziz, A., & Naima, U.
Affiliations
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • International Islamic University Chittagong (BD)
Corresponding author
Aziz, Abdul
Venue
Technology in Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
64
Pages
101509
ISSN
0160-791X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3119773245
Cited by
373
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 6
FWCI
44.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Technology in Society (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
  • Fordham University
  • King Abdulaziz University
  • University of Queensland
  • Swinburne University of Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Economic Growth and Development
Keywords
digital financial inclusion, digital finance, financial inclusion, marginalized communities, digital technology adoption, financial literacy, internet access, financial infrastructure, Bangladesh

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review