Cited by 310Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisFinancial Literacy and BehaviorFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance

Digital financial literacy and financial well-being

Open access
Choung, Youngjoo, Chatterjee, Swarn, Pak, Tae-Young·2023·Finance research letters

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104438

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to Choung, digital financial literacy affects perceived usefulness by enhancing individuals' ability to assess platform features, compare loan conditions, and identify value propositions that correspond to their business needs.

    “According to Choung [26], DFL affects perceived usefulness by enhancing individuals' ability to assess platform features, compare loan conditions, and identify value propositions that correspond to their business needs.”

    From Enhancing Digital Financial Literacy and Digital Trust for Sustainable Online Loan Adoption among Micro-Entrepreneurs in Developing Economies (2026) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Introduction (p. 3) describes DFL as enabling informed decisions about digital financial services, and Section 2.3 (p. 6) includes awareness of those services and practical ability to use them. The paper does not say that DFL affects perceived usefulness through assessing platform features, comparing loan conditions, or identifying propositions suited to business needs. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Choung et al. (2023) found perceived usefulness often dominates in advanced economies.

    “where perceived usefulness often dominates (e.g., Choung et al., 2023 [26])”

    From Enhancing Digital Financial Literacy and Digital Trust for Sustainable Online Loan Adoption among Micro-Entrepreneurs in Developing Economies (2026) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Results (pp. 7–8) examine digital financial literacy and financial well-being, and the Discussion (p. 9) compares digital literacy with financial knowledge. Searches for “perceived usefulness” and for usefulness as a dominant predictor in advanced economies found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Choung et al. (2023) found perceived usefulness often dominates in advanced economies.

    “where perceived usefulness often dominates (e.g., Choung et al., 2023 [26])”

    From Enhancing Digital Financial Literacy and Digital Trust for Sustainable Online Loan Adoption among Micro-Entrepreneurs in Developing Economies (2026) · cites this paper as Choung et al., 2023

    The Introduction (p. 3) discusses digital financial literacy and financial well-being, while the Discussion (p. 9) compares the effects of digital literacy and financial knowledge. Neither addresses whether perceived usefulness dominates in advanced economies. Searches for “perceived usefulness” and for technology adoption in advanced economies found no passage supporting the attributed point. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Lyons, A. C., & Fontes, A. (2021). Impacts of financial and digital literacy and social media on the financial health of U.S. households. Available at SSRN.
  2. Morgan, P. J., Huang, B., & Long, T. Q. (2019). The need to promote digital financial literacy for the digital age. In Realizing education for all in the digital age. T20 Report (pp. 40-46). https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/503706/adbi-realizing-education-alldigital-age.pdf#page=56.
  3. Rahayu, R., Juita, V., Rahman, A., Fitriamiranti, S., & Rafles, R. (2022b). The level of digital financial literacy and financial well-being of people in West Sumatra Indonesia. Operations Management and Information System Studies, 2 (2), 66-76.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Choung, Y., Chatterjee, S., & Pak, T.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Inha University (KR)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Corresponding author
Pak, Tae-Young
Venue
Finance research letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
58
Pages
104438
ISSN
1544-6123 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386483653
Cited by
310
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 175 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 4
FWCI
116.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Finance research letters (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Keywords
digital financial literacy, financial well-being, financial knowledge, financial education, sociodemographic differences, Korean adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review