The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Asymmetric inter-linkages between green technology innovation and consumption-based carbon emissions in BRICS countries using quantile-on-quantile framework
Abstract
Abstract The role of reliable Carbon emission measures and relevant climate policy is imperative in realizing Sustainable Development Goals. A large extent of the literature concludes the emissions-mitigating effect of green innovations in a linear framework and ignored structural changes, technological revolutions, and socio-economic reforms that create non-linearity. Apart from that, there is a murky relationship between emissions and green innovation, where two-way links exist between both variables. Therefore, this study draws the inter-linkages between green technology innovation (GI) and carbon emissions (consumption-based and terrestrial emissions) in BRICS countries using monthly data from 1990 to 2017. Our preliminary findings strictly reject the preposition of data normality and highlight that the observed relationship is quantile-dependent. Therefore, a complete set of non-linear modeling is employed that included; Quantile unit root, Quantile cointegration, Quantile causality, and Quantile on Quantile regression to unveil hidden unit root, cointegration, causality, and association between variables. The results exhibit that the emissions-mitigating effect of GI is only pronounced at higher emissions quantiles in Brazil, China, India, and Russia, whereas at lower emissions quantile, GI is weekly or positively linked with carbon emissions. On the flipside, higher carbon emissions instigate GI across medium to higher emissions quantiles in Brazil, China, and India. Unlike them, Russia produces different outcomes, where higher emissions are associated with lower GI across all quantiles. The overall results suggest that GI (carbon emissions) mitigate (instigate) carbon emissions (GI) when a country is embodied with higher level of emissions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods
Granger, C. W. J. (1969) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912791 · Cited by 22,989
Nguyen, T. T., Pham, T. A. T., & Tram, H. T. X. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110162 · Cited by 494
The role of globalization in energy consumption: A quantile cointegrating regression approach
Shahbaz, M., Lahiani, A., Abosedra, S., & Hammoudeh, S. (2018) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2018.02.009 · Cited by 236
Cited by
Fang, Z., Razzaq, A., Mohsin, M., & Irfan, M. (2022) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101844 · Cited by 380
Self-citationZhao, X., Mahendru, M., Ma, X., Rao, A., & Shang, Y. (2022) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.076 · Cited by 346
Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Zafar, A. U., & Appolloni, A. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2865 · Cited by 312
Sun, Y., Li, H., Andlib, Z., & Genie, M. G. (2022) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.112 · Cited by 269
Razzaq, A., Ajaz, T., Li, J. C., Irfan, M., & Suksatan, W. (2021) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102302 · Cited by 253
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Razzaq, A., Wang, Y., Chupradit, S., Suksatan, W., & Shahzad, F.
- Venue
- Technology in Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 66
- Pages
- 101656
- ISSN
- 0160-791X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3182519251
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 48.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Asymmetric inter-linkages between green technology innovation and consumption-based carbon emissions in BRICS countries using quantile-on-quantile framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101656
- The paper
- Razzaq, A., Wang, Y., Chupradit, S., Suksatan, W., & Shahzad, F. (2021). Asymmetric inter-linkages between green technology innovation and consumption-based carbon emissions in BRICS countries using quantile-on-quantile framework. Technology in Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101656
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.