The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can industry 5.0 revolutionize the wave of resilience and social value creation? A multi-criteria framework to analyze enablers
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Environmental and Health Impacts of Air Pollution: A Review
Manisalidis, I., Stavropoulou, E., Stavropoulos, A., & Bezirtzoglou, E. (2020) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00014 · Cited by 5,269
Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications
Maddikunta, P. K. R., Pham, Q.-V., B, P., Deepa, N., Dev, K., Gadekallu, T. R., Ruby, R., & Liyanage, M. (2022) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2021.100257 · Cited by 1,890
Industry 5.0—A Human-Centric Solution
Nahavandi, S. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11164371 · Cited by 1,695
A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems
Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Kazimieras Zavadskas, E., & Turskis, Z. (2019) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-05-2017-0458 · Cited by 1,117
From Smart Farming towards Agriculture 5.0: A Review on Crop Data Management
Saiz-Rubio, V., & Rovira-Más, F. (2020) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy10020207 · Cited by 974
The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration
Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, M., Shiga, T., Tomizawa, G., Tatsuta, R., & Mieno, H. (1993) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/0165-0114(93)90251-c · Cited by 890
Belhadi, A., Kamble, S., Jabbour, C. J. C., Gunasekaran, A., Ndubisi, N. O., & Venkatesh, M. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120447 · Cited by 882
Industry 5.0 and Human-Robot Co-working
Demir, K. A., Döven, G., & Sezen, B. (2019) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.104 · Cited by 746
Longo, F., Padovano, A., & Umbrello, S. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10124182 · Cited by 687
Sony, M., & Naik, S. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101248 · Cited by 651
Cited by
Industry 4.0 vs. Industry 5.0: Co-existence, Transition, or a Hybrid
Golovianko, M., Terziyan, V., Branytskyi, V., & Malyk, D. (2023) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.206 · Cited by 341
Employment 5.0: The work of the future and the future of work
Kolade, O., & Owoseni, A. (2022) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102086 · Cited by 269
Lv, Z. (2023) · Research · doi:10.34133/research.0071 · Cited by 108
“However, they could only perform repetitive actions in a fixed environment [57].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Sindhwani, R., Afridi, S., Kumar, A., Banaitis, A., Luthra, S., & Singh, P. L.
- Venue
- Technology in Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-02
- Volume
- 68
- Pages
- 101887
- ISSN
- 0160-791X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4205523466
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 27.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Can industry 5.0 revolutionize the wave of resilience and social value creation? A multi-criteria framework to analyze enablers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101887
- The paper
- Sindhwani, R., Afridi, S., Kumar, A., Banaitis, A., Luthra, S., & Singh, P. L. (2022). Can industry 5.0 revolutionize the wave of resilience and social value creation? A multi-criteria framework to analyze enablers. Technology in Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101887
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
