The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Value-Oriented and Ethical Technology Engineering in Industry 5.0: A Human-Centric Perspective for the Design of the Factory of the Future
Open accessAbstract
Although manufacturing companies are currently situated at a transition point in what has been called Industry 4.0, a new revolutionary wave—Industry 5.0—is emerging as an ‘Age of Augmentation’ when the human and machine reconcile and work in perfect symbiosis with one another. Recent years have indeed assisted in drawing attention to the human-centric design of Cyber-Physical Production Systems (CPPS) and to the genesis of the ‘Operator 4.0’, two novel concepts that raise significant ethical questions regarding the impact of technology on workers and society at large. This paper argues that a value-oriented and ethical technology engineering in Industry 5.0 is an urgent and sensitive topic as demonstrated by a survey administered to industry leaders from different companies. The Value Sensitive Design (VSD) approach is proposed as a principled framework to illustrate how technologies enabling human–machine symbiosis in the Factory of the Future can be designed to embody elicited human values and to illustrate actionable steps that engineers and designers can take in their design projects. Use cases based on real solutions and prototypes discuss how a design-for-values approach aids in the investigation and mitigation of ethical issues emerging from the implementation of technological solutions and, hence, support the migration to a symbiotic Factory of the Future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Survey of Value Sensitive Design Methods
Friedman, B., Hendry, D. G., & Borning, A. (2017) · Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1561/1100000015 · Cited by 389
Translating Values into Design Requirements
van de Poel, I. (2013) · Philosophy of Engineering and Technology · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7762-0_20 · Cited by 273
Cited by
Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications
Maddikunta, P. K. R., Pham, Q.-V., B, P., Deepa, N., Dev, K., Gadekallu, T. R., Ruby, R., & Liyanage, M. (2022) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2021.100257 · Cited by 1,890
Edge computing for Industry 5.0: fundamental, applications and research challenges
Sharma, M., Tomar, A., & Hazra, A. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3359297 · Cited by 312
COVID-19 and hospitality 5.0: Redefining hospitality operations
Pillai, S. G., Haldorai, K., Seo, W. S., & Kim, W. G. (2021) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102869 · Cited by 303
Mapping value sensitive design onto AI for social good principles
Umbrello, S., & van de Poel, I. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00038-3 · Cited by 251
Self-citationBlockchain-based trust mechanism for digital twin empowered Industrial Internet of Things
A., S., Vairavasundaram, S., Kotecha, K., V., I., Ravi, L., Selvachandran, G., & Abraham, A. (2023) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2022.11.002 · Cited by 156
Metadata
- Authors
- Longo, F., Padovano, A., & Umbrello, S.
- Venue
- Applied Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-06-18
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4182
- ISSN
- 2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3036816925
- Cited by
- 687
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 46.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Value-Oriented and Ethical Technology Engineering in Industry 5.0: A Human-Centric Perspective for the Design of the Factory of the Future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/app10124182
- The paper
- Longo, F., Padovano, A., & Umbrello, S. (2020). Value-Oriented and Ethical Technology Engineering in Industry 5.0: A Human-Centric Perspective for the Design of the Factory of the Future. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124182
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.