Cited by 52Geological and Tectonic Studies in Latin AmericaGeological and Geophysical StudiesGeological and Geochemical Analysis

Heat flow and lithospheric thickness analysis in the Patagonian asthenospheric windows, southern South America

Open access
Ávila, Pilar, Dávila, Federico M.·2018·Tectonophysics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tecto.2018.10.006

Cites

54 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An asthenospheric window underneath much of the South American continent increases the heat flow in the southern Patagonian Andes, where glacial-interglacial cycles drive the building and melting of the Patagonian Icefields since the latest Miocene.

    “An asthenospheric window underneath much of the South American continent increases the heat flow in the southern Patagonian Andes where glacial-interglacial cycles drive the building and melting of the Patagonian Icefields since the latest Miocene.”

    From Fast uplift in the southern Patagonian Andes due to long- and short-term deglaciation and the asthenospheric window underneath (2024) · cites this paper as Ávila and Dávila, 2018

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hechem, J.J., Strelkov, E., 2002. Secuencia sedimentaria mesozoica del Golfo San Jorge. In: Geología y Recursos Naturales de Santa Cruz. Relatorio Del XV Congreso Geológico Argentino, pp. 1-9.
  2. Stern, C.R., 1989. Garnet peridotite xenoliths from the Pali Aike basalts of southernmost South America. In: Kimberlites Relat. Rocks, pp. 735-744.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ávila, P., & Dávila, F. M.
Affiliations
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
Corresponding author
Ávila, Pilar
Venue
Tectonophysics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
747-748
Pages
99-107
ISSN
0040-1951 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2895456593
Cited by
52
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tectonophysics (publishedVersion)
  • Conicet (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • UNC
  • FONCyT (PICT-2015-1092, PICT-E 2018)
  • CONICET (PUE-2016-CICTERRA)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Tectonic Studies in Latin America
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Keywords
lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary, heat flow, lithospheric thickness, slab window, subduction, thermal conductivity, Patagonia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review