The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
User acceptance of media tablets: An empirical examination of perceived value
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to Yu et al. [28], the most significant factor affecting the adoption of media tablets is perceived usefulness, particularly when moderated by perceived value.”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“In the field of information system research, perceived value is commonly acknowledged as a robust predictor of technology acceptance [17,28,31,32,53,54].”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“A growing body of research supports the notion that an inverse correlation exists between perceived risks and perceived value when predicting technology use intention [28,29,30,36,43]”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · Cited by 23,066
A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298504900403 · Cited by 21,645
Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298805200302 · Cited by 18,292
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664
Consumer Perceived Value: The Development of a Multiple Item Scale
Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(01)00041-0 · Cited by 6,643
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Lee, 2005, A study on the adoption patterns and usage of the mobile services: focusing on the PDA systems, Korea Bus. Res., 34, 1023
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kim, M.-K., Oh, J.-S., Park, J., & Joo, C. (2018) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.064 · Cited by 300
Lee, C.-H., & Chen, C.-W. (2021) · Information · doi:10.3390/info12060241 · Cited by 493
What drives smartwatch purchase intention? Perspectives from hardware, software, design, and value
Hsiao, K., & Chen, C. (2017) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.002 · Cited by 233
Travelers’ intention to adopt virtual reality: A consumer value perspective
Vishwakarma, P., Mukherjee, S., & Datta, B. (2020) · Journal of Destination Marketing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100456 · Cited by 190
Information technology adoption: a review of the literature and classification
Salahshour Rad, M., Nilashi, M., & Mohamed Dahlan, H. (2018) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-017-0534-z · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, J., Lee, H., Ha, I., & Zo, H.
- Affiliations
- Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (KR)
- Dankook University (KR)
- Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute (KR)
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Hwansoo
- Venue
- Telematics and Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 206-223
- ISSN
- 0736-5853 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2220002701
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 8
- FWCI
- 17.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Telematics and Informatics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
- Keywords
- user acceptance, perceived value, perceived usefulness, perceived enjoyment, social image, risk perception, brand names, product design, functionality, content, price, personal innovativeness, technology adoption, moderating effect
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
