Cited by 65Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and RegulationMilitary Strategy and Technology

Ethics of autonomous weapons systems and its applicability to any AI systems

Gómez de Ágreda, Ángel·2020·Telecommunications Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101953

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gómez de Ágreda, Á.
Venue
Telecommunications Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
101953
ISSN
0308-5961 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3014804709
Cited by
65
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 7
FWCI
16.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Telecommunications Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Military Strategy and Technology
Keywords
autonomous weapons, AI ethics, dual-use technology, artificial intelligence in warfare, human agency, moral responsibility, human control over AI, code of ethics, algorithmic transparency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review