Cited by 407Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningEthics and Social Impacts of AIAccess Control and Trust

Artificial Intelligence Trust, Risk and Security Management (AI TRiSM): Frameworks, applications, challenges and future research directions

Habbal, Adib, Ali, Mohamed Khalif, Abuzaraida, Mustafa Ali·2024·Expert Systems with Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122442

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The People, Process, Technology (PPT) framework, widely used in cybersecurity, is also well-suited for evaluating LLM benchmarks due to its holistic approach, addressing not just technical factors, but also human and procedural elements.

    “The People, Process, Technology (PPT) framework, widely used in cybersecurity, is also well-suited for evaluating LLM benchmarks due to its holistic approach, addressing not just technical factors, but also human and procedural elements [37].”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Habbal, A., Ali, M. K., & Abuzaraida, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Karabük University (TR)
  • Misurata University (LY)
Corresponding author
  • Habbal, Adib
  • Ali, Mohamed Khalif
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-04
Volume
240
Pages
122442
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388720055
Cited by
407
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 117 · 2025: 164 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 12
FWCI
36.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Access Control and Trust
Keywords
AI risk management, trustworthy AI, adversarial attacks, regulatory compliance, skills gap, AI ethics, metaverse, smart healthcare, stakeholder collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review