Generative AI literacy: Scale development and its influence on privacy protection behaviors and information verification behaviors
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612460685 · Cited by 4,271 · see citing works
Kim, H.-Y. (2013) · Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics · doi:10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52 · Cited by 4,035 · see citing works
Wang, B., Rau, P.-L. P., & Yuan, T. (2023) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2022.2072768 · Cited by 1,036 · see citing works
Avoidance of Information Technology Threats: A Theoretical Perspective1
Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2009) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20650279 · Cited by 733 · see citing works
Combining human and artificial intelligence for enhanced AI literacy in higher education
Tzirides, A. O. (., Zapata, G., Kastania, N. P., Saini, A. K., Castro, V., Ismael, S. A., You, Y.-L., Santos, T. A. D., Searsmith, D., O'Brien, C., et al. (2024) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100184 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Mosteller, J., & Poddar, A. (2017) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2017.02.003 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Tweet, but verify: epistemic study of information verification on Twitter
Zubiaga, A., & Ji, H. (2014) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-014-0163-y · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Privacy and smart speakers: A multi-dimensional approach
Lutz, C., & Newlands, G. (2021) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2021.1897914 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Conceptualizing generative AI as style engines: Application archetypes and implications
Riemer, K., & Peter, S. (2024) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102824 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Graphic Design Education in the Era of Text‐to‐Image Generation: Transitioning to Contents Creator
Hwang, Y., & Wu, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Art & Design Education · doi:10.1111/jade.12558 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Yan, W., Liu, Y.-L., Mamaeva, V., Dong, F., Tao, G., Li, R., & Yang, H.
- Affiliations
- City University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Shanghai University (CN)
- Venue
- Telecommunications Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2026-03
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 103117
- ISSN
- 0308-5961 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4416527421
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28
- FWCI
- 32.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Telecommunications Policy (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Shanghai University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
- Keywords
- generative AI literacy, scale development, privacy protection behavior, AI awareness, misinformation, systemic bias, AI usage frequency, responsible AI adoption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
