Contributors to impaired bone health in type 2 diabetes
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with numerous complications, including increased risk of fragility fractures, despite seemingly protective factors [e.g., normal bone mineral density and increased body mass index(BMI)]. However, fracture risk in T2D is underestimated by current fracture risk calculators. Importantly, post-fracture mortality is worse in T2D following any fracture, highlighting the importance of identifying high-risk patients that may benefit from targeted management. Several diabetes-related factors are associated with increased fracture risk, including exogenous insulin therapy, vascular complications, and poor glycaemic control, although detailed comprehensive studies to identify the independent contributions of these factors are lacking. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are complex and multifactorial, with different factors contributing during the course of T2D disease. These include obesity, hyperinsulinaemia, hyperglycaemia, accumulation of advanced glycation end products, and vascular supply affecting bone-cell function and survival and bone-matrix composition. This review summarises the current understanding of the contributors to impaired bone health in T2D, and proposes an updated approach to managing these patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
30-40% of DM patients require exogenous insulin administration for glycemic control, which paradoxically enhances osteoclastogenesis.
“Notably, 30-40% of DM patients require exogenous insulin administration for glycemic control, which paradoxically enhances osteoclastogenesis8.”
From Microenvironment-responsive multifunctional enzyme-linked hydrogel for diabetic bone defect regeneration. (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 112 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- Sheu, A., Greenfield, J. R., White, C. P., & Center, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Sheu, Angela
- Venue
- Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-48
- ISSN
- 1043-2760 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4309915618
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 112
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Diabetes Australia
- Bayer
- Osteoporosis Australia
- Royal Australasian College of Physicians
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, bone health, fragility fractures, fracture risk, insulin therapy, glycemic control, advanced glycation end products, hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, obesity, vascular complications, post-fracture mortality, bone mineral density
- MeSH terms
- Bone and Bones, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Bone Density, Glycation End Products, Advanced, Fractures, Bone
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review