Cited by 22Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic speciesAnimal Genetics and Reproduction

Collection and preservation of pygmy hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis) semen

Abstract

Knowledge about the reproduction of the endangered pygmy hippopotamus is almost non-existent. This study takes the first step toward changing this by devising a protocol for the collection, evaluation, and short-term preservation of semen of this endangered species. Semen was collected successfully from seven bulls by electroejaculation, using a specially designed rectal probe. Mean +/- SEM values of native sperm parameters from combined best fractions were: motility-80.0 +/- 4.1%, concentration-2421 +/- 1530 x 10(6) cells/mL, total collected cell number-759 +/- 261 x 10(6) cells, intact acrosome-87.8 +/- 1.2%, intact morphology-52.7 +/- 4.3%, and, for some, hypoosmotic swelling test-79.3 +/- 4.4% and seminal plasma osmolarity-297.5 +/- 3.3 mOsm. Seven different extenders were tested for sperm storage under chilling conditions: Berliner Cryomedium (BC), Biladyl, modification of Kenney modified Tyrode's medium (KMT), MES medium, Androhep((R)), boar M III() extender and Human Sperm Refrigeration Medium. While differences between males were apparent, the BC was consistently superior to all other extenders in sperm motility and facilitated storage for 7 d with up to 30% motility and some motility even after 3 weeks. With this knowledge in hand, the obvious two directions for future research are to conduct artificial insemination and to develop a technique for sperm cryopreservation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.03.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ejaculates from seven C. liberiensis had an average volume of 3.0 ± 0.9 (SEM) ml and a concentration of 2.1 ± 1.3 × 10^6 spermatozoa per ml.

    “Ejaculates from seven C. liberiensis had an average volume of 3.0 ± 0.9 (SEM) ml and a concentration of 2.1 ± 1.3 × 10 6 spermatozoa per ml (Saragusty et al. 2010).”

    From Choeropsis liberiensis (Artiodactyla: Hippopotamidae) (2019) · cites this paper as Saragusty et al. 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saragusty, J., Hildebrandt, T. B., Bouts, T., Göritz, F., & Hermes, R.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (DE)
  • Zoological Society of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Saragusty, J.
Venue
Theriogenology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
74
Issue
4
Pages
652-657
ISSN
0093-691X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065794822
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Theriogenology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
Keywords
pygmy hippopotamus, Choeropsis liberiensis, semen collection, electroejaculation, sperm cryopreservation, semen extenders, sperm motility, sperm morphology, acrosome integrity, hypo-osmotic swelling test, artificial insemination
MeSH terms
Acrosome, Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Cryoprotective Agents, Male, Mammals, Semen, Semen Preservation, Sperm Motility, Cryopreservation, Endangered Species

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review