Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 441

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Severe COVID-19 infection associated with endothelial activation

Open access
Escher, Robert, Breakey, Neal, Lämmle, Bernhard·2020·Thrombosis Research

Abstract

Mounting evidence supports the strong prognostic importance of Ddimers and the impact of coagulopathy in COVID-19 patients [1,2,3]. We would like to emphasize the significance of anticoagulation in severe COVID-19 disease, by adding our observation of highly pathological data on anti-phospholipid-antibodies, von Willebrand Factor (VWF) and Factor VIII. We observed a 72-year-old previously healthy male patient admitted to our hospital 6 days after the onset of respiratory symptoms and fever. Six days after admission, following a rapid deterioration of his clinical condition with development of acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute renal insufficiency and altered mental status, he was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU). Supportive care with intubation, positive pressure ventilation and renal replacement therapy led to a stabilization of his condition. During the ICU stay, a continual increase of D-dimers was observed, from initially 0.69 mg/L to 2.55 mg/L on day 4, 2.81 mg/L on day 11 to 20.63 mg/L on day 21. At this time, IgG anti-cardiolipin antibodies (ACA) and antibeta2-glycoprotein I (anti-β2-GPI) were negative, but IgM ACA elevated at 121.9 CU (normal < 20 CU) and IgM anti-β2-GPI elevated at 275.3 CU (normal < 20 CU). Furthermore, on day 21, we also observed a concurrent massive elevation of VWF, with VWF:antigen 555% (normal 42–136%) and VWF:activity 520% (normal 42–168%), accompanied by an increase of Factor VIII clotting activity of 369% (normal 55–164%). The increased VWF points towards massive endothelial stimulation and damage with release of VWF from Weibel-Palade bodies. Interestingly, endothelial cells express ACE2, the receptor for SARS-CoV-2, thus possibly mediating endothelial activation [4]. The patient received prophylactic anticoagulation with dalteparin 5000 U s.c. daily from admission to hospital. We increased the dose to therapeutic anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin on day 21, without hemorrhagic complication. Since then, the patient is steadily improving, ventilation and hemodialysis could be successfully withdrawn, and he has been transferred from the ICU to a general ward. D-dimers decreased to 6.26 mg/L on day 24 and to 1.94 mg/L on day 29. Considering the high levels of VWF and factor VIII, we strongly suggest administering higher, possibly therapeutic doses of anticoagulation to these patients. The role of antiphospholipid antibodies, VWF and FVIII needs further study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.04.014

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 441

Metadata

Authors
Escher, R., Breakey, N., & Lämmle, B.
Venue
Thrombosis Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
190
Pages
62
ISSN
0049-3848 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3017293186
Cited by
441
References
4
FWCI
12.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Severe COVID-19 infection associated with endothelial activation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.thromres.2020.04.014
The paper
Escher, R., Breakey, N., & Lämmle, B. (2020). Severe COVID-19 infection associated with endothelial activation. Thrombosis Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2020.04.014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.