The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microbials for the production of monoclonal antibodies and antibody fragments
Open accessAbstract
•Glycosylated full length antibodies are currently produced in mammalian cells.•Antibody fragments can be produced in microbial organisms.•Strain engineering allows production of full length antibodies in microbials.•Microbials provide several advantages over mammalian cells. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and antibody fragments represent the most important biopharmaceutical products today. Because full length antibodies are glycosylated, mammalian cells, which allow human-like N-glycosylation, are currently used for their production. However, mammalian cells have several drawbacks when it comes to bioprocessing and scale-up, resulting in long processing times and elevated costs. By contrast, antibody fragments, that are not glycosylated but still exhibit antigen binding properties, can be produced in microbial organisms, which are easy to manipulate and cultivate. In this review, we summarize recent advances in the expression systems, strain engineering, and production processes for the three main microbials used in antibody and antibody fragment production, namely Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia pastoris, and Escherichia coli. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and antibody fragments represent the most important biopharmaceutical products today. Because full length antibodies are glycosylated, mammalian cells, which allow human-like N-glycosylation, are currently used for their production. However, mammalian cells have several drawbacks when it comes to bioprocessing and scale-up, resulting in long processing times and elevated costs. By contrast, antibody fragments, that are not glycosylated but still exhibit antigen binding properties, can be produced in microbial organisms, which are easy to manipulate and cultivate. In this review, we summarize recent advances in the expression systems, strain engineering, and production processes for the three main microbials used in antibody and antibody fragment production, namely Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia pastoris, and Escherichia coli. IntroductionOver the past three decades, the biopharmaceutical market has become a significant component of the global pharmaceutical market accounting for around 40% of its sales. The use of organisms as biopharmaceutical production factories offers several advantages over chemical synthesis. Microorganisms can produce high molecular weight compounds such as proteins [1Lee J.Y. Bang D. Challenges in the chemical synthesis of average sized proteins: sequential vs. convergent ligation of multiple peptide fragments.Biopolymers. 2010; 94: 441-447Crossref PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar] and carry out highly enantio- and regio-selective reactions by their native enzymatic machinery – these reactions are hard to achieve by chemical synthesis. The use of microorganisms also enables repeated implementation of immobilized enzymes or cells resulting in the reduction of the overall production costs [2Bolivar J.M. et al.Shine a light on immobilized enzymes: real-time sensing in solid supported biocatalysts.Trends Biotechnol. 2013; 31: 194-203Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (45) Google Scholar]. Finally, processes employing microorganisms do not generate organic and inorganic pollutants, such as mercury and toluene [3Chelliapan S. Sallis P.J. Removal of organic compound from pharmaceutical wastewater using advanced oxidation processes.J. Sci. Ind. Res. 2013; 72: 248-254Google Scholar].The biopharmaceutical market originated in the late 1970s with the establishment of recombinant DNA techniques. The industrial interest materialized almost immediately and in 1982 the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the commercialization of humulin, the human insulin analog, recombinantly produced in the bacterium E. coli [4Walsh G. New biopharmaceuticals: a review of new biologic drug approvals over the years, featuring highlights from 2010 and 2011.Process Development Forum. BioPharm International, 2012http://www.processdevelopmentforum.com/articles/new-biopharmaceuticals-a-review-of-new-biologic-drug-approvals-over-the-years-featuring-highlights-from-2010-and-2011/Google Scholar]. For a while the FDA only allowed the transformation of bacteria and the expression of small, non-glycosylated proteins, like insulin, due to concern about introducing new toxicities such as contaminating bacterial substances, which raise immunogenic reactions in patients. However, with the development of selectable resistance markers, like antibiotic resistance markers, and the possibility of production in eukaryotic organisms, the FDA began showing increasing flexibility towards biotechnological innovation, leading to a continually increasing number of approved new biological entities (NBEs). In 2012, the biopharmaceutical market turnover was estimated at around 100–120 billion US dollars per year [5Butler M. Meneses-Acosta A. Recent advances in technology supporting biopharmaceutical production from mammalian cells.Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012;
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2014
Walsh, G. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3040 · Cited by 1,008
Advances in Mammalian cell line development technologies for recombinant protein production
Lai, T., Yang, Y., & Ng, S. (2013) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph6050579 · Cited by 322
Cited by
Gmeiner, C., Saadati, A., Maresch, D., Krasteva, S., Frank, M., Altmann, F., Herwig, C., & Spadiut, O. (2015) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/s12934-014-0183-3 · Cited by 305
Self-citationDavid vs. Goliath: The Structure, Function, and Clinical Prospects of Antibody Fragments
Bates, A., & Power, C. A. (2019) · Antibodies · doi:10.3390/antib8020028 · Cited by 237
Brunner, M., Fricke, J., Kroll, P., & Herwig, C. (2017) · Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00449-016-1693-7 · Cited by 79
Self-citationPerfusion culture of Chinese Hamster Ovary cells for bioprocessing applications
MacDonald, M. A., Nöbel, M., Roche Recinos, D., Martínez, V. S., Schulz, B. L., Howard, C. B., Baker, K., Shave, E., Lee, Y. Y., Marcellin, E., et al. (2022) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/07388551.2021.1998821 · Cited by 55
Fink, M., Vazulka, S., Egger, E., Jarmer, J., Grabherr, R., Cserjan‐Puschmann, M., & Striedner, G. (2019) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.201800637 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Spadiut, O., Capone, S., Krainer, F., Glieder, A., & Herwig, C.
- Venue
- Trends in Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-60
- ISSN
- 0167-7799 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050405684
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbials for the production of monoclonal antibodies and antibody fragments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.10.002
- The paper
- Spadiut, O., Capone, S., Krainer, F., Glieder, A., & Herwig, C. (2014). Microbials for the production of monoclonal antibodies and antibody fragments. Trends in Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.10.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.