Functional neuroimaging of autobiographical memory
Open accessAbstract
Functional neuroimaging studies of autobiographical memory have grown dramatically in recent years. These studies are important because they can investigate the neural correlates of processes that are difficult to study using laboratory stimuli, including: (i) complex constructive processes, (ii) recollective qualities of emotion and vividness, and (iii) remote memory retrieval. Constructing autobiographical memories involves search, monitoring and self-referential processes that are associated with activity in separable prefrontal regions. The contributions of emotion and vividness have been linked to the amygdala and visual cortex respectively. Finally, there is evidence that recent and remote autobiographical memories might activate the hippocampus equally, which has implications for memory-consolidation theories. The rapid development of innovative methods for eliciting personal memories in the scanner provides the opportunity to delve into the functional neuroanatomy of our personal past.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The introduction notes that prior fMRI studies of episodic recall and future thinking have found a consistent distributed set of brain regions.
“have revealed a consistent and distributed network of associated brain regions,”
From Using Imagination to Understand the Neural Basis of Episodic Memory (2007) · cites this paper as Cabeza and St Jacques, 2007
The present study advances efforts to dissociate functions of brain regions consistently activated in episodic memory recall and episodic future thinking.
“Taken together, therefore, the present study advances efforts to dissociate the functions of the many brain regions consistently activated in studies of episodic memory recall (Maguire, 2001; Svoboda et al., 2006; Cabeza and St Jacques, 2007) and episodic future thinking (Atance and O'Neill, 2001; Addis et al., 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007)”
From Using Imagination to Understand the Neural Basis of Episodic Memory (2007) · cites this paper as Cabeza and St Jacques, 2007
Prior laboratory-based EM studies controlled only for memory retrieval but not for memory encoding.
“However, these studies controlled only for memory retrieval but not for memory encoding [4].”
From First-person view of one’s body in immersive virtual reality: Influence on episodic memory (2019) · cites this paper as [4]
During the presentation of the target photograph compared with the lure photograph, reliving was associated with a number of regions typically recruited during autobiographical memory retrieval.
“During the presentation of the target photograph compared with the lure photograph, reliving was associated with a number of regions typically recruited during autobiographical memory retrieval (43), including anterior and posterior hippocampus, left ventrolateral PFC, rostral medial and vmPFC, posterior cingulate, posterior inferior parietal cortex, and lateral temporal cortex (Fig. S3).”
From Neural mechanisms of reactivation-induced updating that enhance and distort memory (2013) · cites this paper as [43]
Neural regions associated with recollection and memory-updating processes are typically recruited more during autobiographical memory compared with laboratory-based memory retrieval.
“Neural regions associated with recollection and memory-updating processes are typically recruited more during autobiographical memory compared with laboratory-based memory retrieval (43, 61, 62),”
From Neural mechanisms of reactivation-induced updating that enhance and distort memory (2013) · cites this paper as [43]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 292 · Cited by 736
- Authors
- Cabeza, R., & St Jacques, P.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cabeza, Roberto
- ORCID
- Cabeza, Roberto
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 219-227
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109558135
- Cited by
- 736
- References
- 292
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
- DukeSpace (Duke University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- autobiographical memory, neural correlates, memory construction, recollection, memory vividness, remote memory retrieval, prefrontal cortex, amygdala, visual cortex, hippocampus, memory consolidation, self-referential processing
- MeSH terms
- Amygdala, Autobiographies as Topic, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review